Parents’ knowledge of the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide recommendations

Publication: Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
15 September 2023

Abstract

Little is known about Canadians’ knowledge of the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) recommendations. Using cross-sectional survey data from the Guelph Family Health Study, our brief communication aimed to explore parents’ knowledge of the 2019 CFG recommendations through descriptive statistics and content analysis. Among a sample of 122 parents, we found that parents had a general understanding of the 2019 CFG’s recommendations but poor knowledge of specific details of the recommendations, such as the names of the three food groups and which foods contain unhealthy fats.

Introduction

As part of Canada’s Healthy Eating Strategy, Health Canada released a revised Canada’s Food Guide (2019 CFG) in January 2019 (Health Canada 2019). Compared to the previous 2007 CFG, the 2019 CFG underwent several changes, including the amalgamation of the Meat and Alternatives and Milk and Alternatives food groups to a single Protein Foods food group, the replacement of the rainbow format with a plate model to depict the three food groups (Vegetables and Fruit, Whole Grain Foods, and Protein Foods), and the addition of recommendations for healthy eating habits in recognition of the influence social, cultural, and environmental factors have on Canadians’ food choices (Health Canada 2019).
Canadian adults’ awareness, use, and opinions of the 2019 CFG have been explored using surveys (Charlebois et al. 2021; Ramuscak et al. 2022), focus groups (Leme et al. 2022; Laila et al. 2023), and social media analysis (Woodruff et al. 2021). Overall, these studies have found high awareness of the 2019 CFG recommendations and mostly positive opinions. Specifically, research suggests that most Canadians agree that the 2019 CFG is a helpful and trustworthy resource, is based on scientific evidence and best practices, and is flexible to meet their dietary preferences (Charlebois et al. 2021; Ramuscak et al. 2022). However, some research has also revealed negative perceptions of the 2019 CFG, including concerns regarding the perceived omission of dairy products, insufficient guidance on plant-based proteins, and the affordability of meeting the 2019 CFG recommendations (Charlebois et al. 2021; Woodruff et al. 2021; Leme et al. 2022; Ramuscak et al. 2022; Laila et al. 2023).
Less research has explored Canadian adults’ knowledge of the 2019 CFG recommendations. Intervention research suggests that, while certainly not the only factor needed for behaviour change, nutrition knowledge is an important determinant to facilitating diet behaviour change (Patterson et al. 1996; Petrovici and Ritson 2006; Dammann and Smith 2011; Rustad and Smith 2013; Sponk et al. 2014). Thus, understanding Canadians’ knowledge of the 2019 CFG may help inform knowledge mobilization and intervention approaches to support adherence to the 2019 CFG recommendations. The objective of this brief communication is to explore parents’ knowledge of the 2019 CFG recommendations. Our team previously compared parents’ awareness, knowledge, and opinions of the 2007 and 2019 CFGs across factors of relevance to both Food Guides (Ramuscak et al. 2022). This paper describes parents’ knowledge specific to the 2019 CFG that was not included in the previous analyses.

Materials and methods

Participants

This cross-sectional study used data from the Guelph Family Health Study, a randomized controlled trial of a family-based intervention focused on improving health and health-related behaviours (sleep, screen time, physical activity, and family meal routines) among families with preschool aged children. Families were eligible to participate if they had at least one child between 18 months and 5 years, lived in the Guelph-Wellington area in Ontario, Canada, and had one parent who could respond to questionnaires in English. All families who chose to participate in the Guelph Family Health Study provided online informed consent prior to study enrollment. Written consent was obtained at the beginning of the first in-person study visit. The data used in this study were drawn from parents (n = 177) who completed a baseline or 6-month follow-up online survey via Qualtrics between March 2019 and March 2020 on questions related to the 2019 CFG. Because this study examined parents’ knowledge of the 2019 CFG, only participants who identified that they were aware of the 2019 CFG (n = 122) were asked to complete questions about their knowledge of 2019 CFG. Thus, the analytic sample for this study included 122 parents who completed knowledge questions related to the 2019 CFG. This study was approved by the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board (REB No. 17-07-003).

Knowledge measures

To assess parents’ general knowledge of the 2019 CFG recommendations, parents were asked to respond to the open-ended item: “Please list the main recommendations from the new Canada’s Food Guide”.
Parents’ knowledge of the 2019 CFG food groups was assessed by asking parents to “Please list the food groups in the new CFG”, with an open-ended response. Answers were coded as “correct” if parents listed all three 2019 CFG food groups: Vegetable and Fruit, Whole Grain, and Protein Foods. Thematic analysis was applied to determine common incorrect answers.
Parents’ knowledge of the 2019 CFG recommendation on foods to limit was assessed by asking parents “What foods does the new CFG identify as containing unhealthy fats? Check all that apply”. Multiple-choice response options were: fatty meats, high-fat dairy products, highly processed foods such as processed meats or chocolates, some tropical oils such as palm oil and coconut oil, I don’t know, and I am not comfortable answering this question. Parents’ answers were coded as “correct” if they selected all the options as examples of foods containing unhealthy fats in the 2019 CFG recommendations.
Lastly, parents were asked “The new Food Guide recommends that Canadians should cook more often”. Response options were: True, False, I don’t know, and I am not comfortable answering this question. Parents’ answers were coded as “correct” if they selected “True” and incorrect if they selected “False” or “I don’t know”.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the sociodemographics of the sample and the responses to the close-ended knowledge questions. Content analysis was used to analyze parents’ responses to the open-ended questions. This involved coding responses using a predefined coding scheme and then categorizing codes based on common responses (Kleinheksel et al. 2020).

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of the 122 parents who responded to the 2019 CFG knowledge questions are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of parents from the Guelph Family Health Study who responded to the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide knowledge questions, n = 122.
In response to the item “Please list the main recommendations from the new CFG”, parents referred to the plate proportions (38%) with most parents referencing the recommendations to make half their plate vegetables and fruit. Specifically, 14% of parents spoke to the recommendations to make half their plate vegetables and fruit, while 7% of parents commented to make a quarter of their plate whole grains and 6% commented that a quarter of their plate should be protein foods. Other recommendations listed by parents were to eat more plant-based proteins and less animal proteins (34%) and to make water their drink of choice (22%). Less common recommendations listed by parents included to limit consumption of foods high in sodium, sugar, and unhealthy fats (15%) and recommendations related to healthy eating habits, including to be mindful of your eating habits, cook more often, eat meals with others (13%), use food labels (4%), and be aware that food marketing can influence food choices (3%).
Less than one-third (27%) of parents correctly listed all three CFG food groups (Vegetables and Fruit, Whole Grain Foods, and Protein Foods). Common incorrect answers included parents not identifying “whole grains” and using terms such as “grains”, “grain products”, “carbs”, or “starches” (37%), only listing one correct food group (18%), stating “can’t recall” or “don’t remember” (8%), or naming 2007 CFG food groups, such as Milk and Alternatives or Meat and Alternatives (5%).
About 19% of parents correctly identified that fatty meats, high-fat dairy products, highly processed foods, and some tropical oils are all foods that contain unhealthy fats (saturated or trans fats) according to the 2019 CFG recommendations. While 77% of parents correctly identified highly processed foods as a food containing unhealthy fat, only 29% of parents identified some tropical oils as a food containing unhealthy fat according to the 2019 CFG recommendations.
Nearly all parents (98%) correctly identified that the new CFG recommends Canadians should cook more often.

Discussion

In a sample of 122 parents, we found relatively high levels of knowledge of the 2019 CFG’s healthy eating recommendations, such as eat more plant-based proteins and make water the drink of choice, but lower levels of knowledge of the specific details of the recommendations, such as the name of all three food groups and which foods contain unhealthy fats. These results suggest that additional communication may be needed to support Canadians knowledge of dietary recommendations.
Only 27% of parents correctly identified all three food groups in the 2019 CFG: Vegetables and Fruit, Whole Grain Foods, and Protein Foods. Common incorrect answers included parents not identifying “whole grain” foods as a food group and using terms such as “grains”, “grain products”, “carbs”, or “starches” (37%). This finding is similar to Vanderlee and colleagues (2015) study on the 2007 CFG where only 43% of participants were able to correctly recall all four food groups, with the Grain Products food group being the least commonly recalled. Of the many changes to the 2019 Food Guide from the 2007 Food Guide, one of the most significant changes was the emphasis of “Whole Grains” from Grain Products (Health Canada 2019). Whole grains contribute key nutrients to one’s diet, such as dietary fibre, protein, vitamin B6, and magnesium, and high consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of developing noncommunicable diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancers, gastrointestinal disorders, and type 2 diabetes (Prasadi and Joye 2020). However, national data suggest that many Canadians are not consuming whole grain products, with 70% of Canadians failing to make half of their grain products whole grain (Hosseini et al. 2019). Given the consistent finding that the Whole Grain Foods food group is poorly recalled, and Canadians are failing to consume adequate amounts of whole grains, it is important that knowledge translation efforts be put toward educating Canadians on what differentiates a whole grain food from refined grain food and supports to increase availability and consumption of whole grain foods.
Parents also displayed poor knowledge of CFG recommendation on foods containing unhealthy fats, with only 19% of parents correctly identifying fatty meats, high-fat dairy products, highly processed foods, and some tropical oils as foods containing unhealthy fats. While 77% of parents were able to correctly identify highly processed foods as an example of unhealthy fats, only 29% of parents were able to identify some tropical oils as foods containing unhealthy fats. Over the past 10 years, consumption of tropical oils, specifically coconut oil, has risen in popularity among the general population due to effective marketing strategies of their purported health benefits of weight loss, improved immunity, heart health, and enhanced cognition (Sankararaman and Sferra 2018; Duarte et al. 2022). Despite the growing body of literature indicating an absence of cardiometabolic benefits from the intake of coconut oil, individuals continue to believe coconut oil to be a healthful food, with Duarte and colleagues (Duarte et al. 2022) reporting that 82.5% of participants in their study considered coconut oil to be healthy. Given the complexity of the research around saturated fatty acids and misinformation on the healthfulness of tropical oils, it is important that Health Canada continues to monitor the growing body of literature to create clear recommendations for the general population that are easy to understand and implement.
When asked to identify the main 2019 CFG recommendations, more parents identified 2019 CFG recommendations related to food choices such as plate proportions, while fewer parents identified 2019 CFG recommendations related to healthy eating habits (e.g., to be mindful of food choices, eat with others, and cook more often). This finding suggests that food choice recommendations, which have traditionally been the focus of previous CFGs, may resonate more with Canadians than the newly added healthy eating habits recommendations. Conversely, when parents were asked “The new Food Guide recommends that Canadians should cook more often. True or False” nearly all parents (98%) correctly identified that the 2019 CFG recommends Canadians to “Cook more often”. High level of knowledge regarding this specific recommendation may be due to the way the question was asked, as a dichotomous true/false question. However, in line with previous qualitative research, Laila and colleagues (Laila et al. 2023) identified that parents were aware of the 2019 CFG healthy eating habits recommendation and perceived their addition to CFG as beneficial to supporting an overall positive relationship with food. Future research should expand the current findings by examining Canadians’ knowledge of all 2019 CFG recommendations, including those focused on healthy eating habits.
Our study adds to the growing body of literature on the knowledge of 2019 CFG through the unique perspective of parents; however, it is not without limitations. Firstly, our study sample is mainly comprised of a homogenous group of White (84%), highly educated (71% university graduates) parents from high household incomes (69%, ≥$100 000) who reside in Southwestern Ontario. Thus, the results of this study may not be generalizable to Canadian parents from ethnically diverse or low-income backgrounds or those from other geographic regions on Canada. Future research should examine the relationship between Canadians’ knowledge of 2019 CFG recommendations from a diverse sociodemographic and geographic sample. Secondly, our survey did not ask parents about their specific knowledge on all CFG recommendations, such as the use of food labels or the influence of food marketing on food choices. Future research should examine Canadians’ knowledge of all 2019 CFG recommendations and whether this knowledge is associated with improved healthy eating habits. Lastly, parents were provided survey questions about the 2019 CFG from March 2019 to March 2020. Thus, it is unknown whether longer exposure to the 2019 CFG past March 2020 is associated with increased knowledge of the 2019 CFG recommendations. Future prospective research is needed to examine how longer exposure to the CFG and additional knowledge mobilization about the CFG by Health Canada impacts parents’ knowledge of the CFG 2019 recommendations.
In conclusion, our study found that parents had a general understanding of 2019 CFG recommendations; however, the majority of parents had poor knowledge of CFG’s food groups and unhealthy fats. These findings can be used to help improve future CFG revisions and knowledge translation strategies by curating evidence-based, easy-to-understand recommendations and implementing education programs to address Canadian adults’ knowledge gaps and improve their understanding of healthy eating guidelines.

References

Charlebois S., Smook M., Wambui B.N., Somogyi S., Racey M., Fiander D., 2021. Can Canadians afford the new Canada's Food Guide? Assessing barriers and challenges. J. Food Res. 10(6): 22–35.
Dammann K., Smith C. 2011. Food-related environmental, behavioral, and personal factors associated with body mass index among urban, low-income African-American, American Indian, Caucasian women. Am. J. Health Promot. 25(6): e1–e10.
Duarte A., Spiazzi B., Merello E., Amazarray C., Sulzbach de Andrade L., Socal M., 2022. Misinformation in nutrition through the case of coconut oil: an online before-and-after study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 32(6): 1375–1384.
Health Canada. 2019. Canada's Food Guide. Available from https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/.
Hosseini S.H., Jones J.M., Vatanparast H. 2019. Association between grain intake, nutrient intake, and diet quality of Canadians: evidence from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition 2015. Nutrients, 11(8): 1937.
Kleinheksel A.J., Rockich-Winston N., Tawfik H., Wyatt T.R. 2020. Demystifying content analysis. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 84(1): 127–137.
Laila A., Leme A.C.B., Hou S., Ma D.W.L., Haines J. 2023. Perceived challenges and strategies to achieve Canada’s Food Guide recommendation to “Cook more often”: findings from parents of young children. Appetite, 182: 106413.
Leme ACB., Laila A., Hou S., Fisberg R.M., Ma D.W., Fisberg M., Haines J. 2022. Perceptions of the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide: a qualitative study with parents from Southwestern Ontario. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 47(1): 34–40.
Patterson R.E., Kristal A.R., White E. 1996. Do beliefs, knowledge, and perceived norms about diet and cancer predict dietary change? Am. J. Public Health, 86(10): 1394–1400.
Petrovici D.A., Ritson C. 2006. Factors influencing consumer dietary health prevention behaviours. BMC Public Health, 6(222): 26–28.
Prasadi N.V.P., Joye I.J. 2020. Dietary fibre from whole grains and their benefits on metabolic health. Nutrients, 12(10): 3045.
Ramuscak A.V., Ma D.W.L., Forbes L.E., Duncan A.M., Sadowski A., Haines J. 2022. Comparing the perceptions and opinions of the 2007 and 2019 Canada’s food guides among parents with young children. Front. Public Health, 10: 944648.
Rustad C., Smith C. 2013. Nutrition knowledge and associated behavior changes in a holistic short-term nutrition education intervention with low-income women. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour 45: 6 409–498.
Sankararaman S., Sferra T. 2018. Are we going nuts on coconut oil? Curr. Nutr. Rep. 7(3): 107–115.
Sponk I., , Kullen C., , Burdon C., and , O'Connor,  H.  2014. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. British Journal of Nutrition 111: 10 1713–1726.
Vanderlee L., McCrory C., Hammond D. 2015. Awareness and knowledge of recommendations from Canada's food guide. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research 76(3): 146–149.
Woodruff S.J., Coyne P., Fulcher J., Regan R., Rowdon L., Santarossa S., Pegoraro A. 2021. Reaction on social media to online news headlines following the release of Canada’s Food Guide. Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res. 82(1): 16–20.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Volume 48Number 12December 2023
Pages: 1015 - 1018

History

Received: 19 April 2023
Accepted: 15 July 2023
Version of record online: 15 September 2023

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Key Words

  1. Canada’s Food Guide
  2. knowledge
  3. parents
  4. healthy eating recommendations
  5. knowledge translation

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Author Contributions: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing.
Alison M. Duncan
Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
Jess Haines [email protected]
Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
on behalf of the Guelph Family Health Study
University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: AMD, DWLM, JH
Data curation: DWLM, JH
Formal analysis: AVR
Funding acquisition: AMD, DWLM, JH
Investigation: DWLM, JH
Methodology: AVR, JH
Project administration: AMD, DWLM, JH
Resources: AMD, DWLM, JH
Supervision: AMD, DWLM, JH
Writing – original draft: AVR
Writing – review & editing: AVR, AMD, DWLM, JH

Funding Information

This research was supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) and The Helderleigh Foundation. Jess Haines has received funding from the Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research, CIHR, Danone Institute International, Danone Institute North America, Health Canada, and the National Institutes of Health.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media

Cookies Notification

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.
×