Open access

The Canadian Water Resource Vulnerability Index to Permafrost Thaw (CWRVIPT)

Publication: Arctic Science
20 May 2020


This study developed and applied a framework for assessing the vulnerability of pan-Canadian water resources to permafrost thaw. The national-scale work addresses a key, but neglected, information gap, as previous research has focused on small scale physical processes and circumpolar trends. The framework was applied to develop the Canadian Water Resources Vulnerability Index to Permafrost Thaw (CWRVIPT) and map the index across the Canadian North. The CWRVIPT is a linearly additive index of permafrost, terrain, disturbance, and climatic conditions and stressors that influence water budgets and aquatic chemistry. Initial results imply water resources in the western Northwest Territories and Hudson Bay Lowlands are most vulnerable to permafrost thaw; however, water resources on Banks, Victoria and Baffin Islands are also relatively vulnerable. Although terrain and permafrost sub-indices are the largest component of the CWRVIPT across a wide swath from the Mackenzie River Delta to the Hudson Bay Lowlands, the climate sub-index is most important farther north over parts of the southern portion of the Arctic Archipelago. The index can be used to identify areas of water resource vulnerability on which to focus observation and research in the Canadian North.


Cette étude a élaboré et appliqué un cadre d’évaluation de la vulnérabilité des ressources en eau pancanadiennes face au dégel du pergélisol. Les travaux de recherche à l’échelle nationale comblent une lacune importante, mais négligée, en matière d’information, car les recherches antérieures ont porté sur les processus physiques à petite échelle et les tendances circumpolaires. Le cadre a été utilisé pour élaborer l’indice canadien de vulnérabilité des ressources en eau au dégel du pergélisol (« CWRVIPT ») et cartographier l’indice dans le Nord canadien. Le CWRVIPT est un indice additif linéaire des conditions et des facteurs de stress du pergélisol, du terrain, de perturbations et du climat qui influent sur le bilan hydrique et la chimie aquatique. Les premiers résultats laissent entendre que les ressources en eau dans l’ouest des Territoires du Nord-Ouest et les basses terres de la baie d’Hudson sont les plus vulnérables au dégel du pergélisol, mais les ressources en eau des îles Banks, Victoria et Baffin sont également relativement vulnérables. Bien que les sous-indices du terrain et du pergélisol constituent la plus grande composante du CWRVIPT sur une vaste bande allant du delta du fleuve Mackenzie aux basses terres de la baie d’Hudson, le sous-indice climatique est le plus important plus au nord sur certaines parties au sud de l’archipel arctique. L’indice peut être utilisé pour déterminer les zones de vulnérabilité des ressources en eau sur lesquelles l’observation et la recherche dans le Nord canadien devraient porter. [Traduit par la Rédaction]


Recent assessments of climate change reveal that rates of global warming are amplified in polar regions (Box et al. 2019; Bush et al. 2019), with northern Canada warming more than twice as fast as the global average. In response, permafrost across the Arctic is warming and thawing (i.e., melting of ice in frozen ground) (Jorgenson et al. 2006; Hinzman et al. 2013; Liljedahl et al. 2016), and these trends are expected to continue due to high rates of climate change over all polar regions (Zhang et al. 2008; Derksen et al. 2019). From 1990 to the 2090s, permafrost areas in Canada are projected to decrease by approximately 1 million km2, with average active-layer thickness increasing by 0.3 m (Zhang et al. 2008). These changes are anticipated to have significant impacts on carbon fluxes, aquatic ecology, biodiversity, society, and water resources (quantity and quality) (White et al. 2007; Fountain et al. 2012; Walvoord and Kurylyk 2016; Farquarson et al. 2019; Turetsky et al. 2019). For water resources, it is the transition from ground ice to water that allows for hydrological and physical changes, and this can occur at temperatures below 0 °C. Consequently, it is critical to evaluate water resource vulnerability with respect to permafrost thaw.
Although there is consensus that permafrost thaw will continue throughout this century, the extent, rate, and corresponding impacts are not fully understood. However, modifications to the water cycle (Rawlins et al. 2010) and increases in rates of thermokarst (i.e., the thawing of ice-rich permafrost that creates irregular topography and characteristic landforms including lakes, depressions, pits, and mounds) (Jorgenson et al. 2008; Kokelj and Jorgenson 2013) are known impacts of widespread permafrost thaw (Hinzman et al. 2013). Thawing of permafrost is expected to increase hydrological connectivity between groundwater and surface water systems and shift hydrological contributions from surface runoff towards groundwater pathways in cold-climate regions (Frey and McClelland 2009; Karlsson et al. 2012; Connon et al. 2014; Walvoord and Kurylyk 2016; Lamontagne-Hallé et al. 2018). Various process modeling studies (e.g., McKenzie and Voss 2013; Lamontagne-Hallé et al. 2018) further suggest that changes in permafrost thaw patterns and accelerations in thaw can be expected in locations with groundwater flow. These anticipated changes in hydrological conditions explain observed non-stationarity in streamflow time series (Déry et al. 2009).
Extensive physical process-based research has been conducted at smaller catchment-level scales. For instance, thermokarst has been shown to impact solute and sediment flux in the North Slope of Alaska, the Peel Plateau, and the Arctic Archipelago (Lewis et al. 2005; Bowden et al. 2008; Dugan et al. 2012; Kokelj et al. 2013; Malone et al. 2013; Abbott et al. 2015). Permafrost thaw has changed solute loads and drainage networks in the Arctic Archipelago (Fortier et al. 2007; Lafrenière and Lamoureux 2013), runoff pathways in the taiga plains (Wright et al. 2009), and is expected to increase solute loading in surface waters due to greater groundwater contributions (Frey and McClelland 2009).
Despite the progress to date, large knowledge gaps exist. Studies have focused on either investigating the processes by which water cycling and chemistry respond to permafrost thaw at the catchment and smaller scales or describing regional or circumpolar trends, with minimal cross-scale research and a focus on thermal degradation of permafrost rather than loss of ground ice. In particular, the vulnerability of water resources to likely changes associated with potential permafrost thaw has yet to be quantified across the broad range of northern Canadian landscapes.
A key issue is how to incorporate results from process-based studies and extrapolate findings from the catchment scale to project responses across entire regions. Robust scaling tools are needed that account for spatial and temporal variation across regions. One approach to assess potential response(s) of water resources to permafrost thaw is to classify landscapes by the predominant processes expected to occur. These classification exercises act as a partial bridge across scales, as impacts understood at small scales are extrapolated based on expected processes and landscape features that are resolved at larger scales using coarse resolution data. The classification can then be used as the foundation for assessing vulnerability of water resources to permafrost thaw.
Vulnerability indices can be used to assess how specific systems respond to specific perturbations. Examples include the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Vulnerability Index (USDA-SVI) (USDA-NRCS 2012) and a Laurentian Great Lakes ecosystem services vulnerability index (Allan et al. 2013). Of particular note is the Arctic Water Resource Vulnerability Index (AWRVI) that uses a socio-ecological systems perspective to assess resilience and vulnerability of people in Arctic Alaska to changes in water resources (Alessa et al. 2008). Indicators employed in the AWRVI include freshwater biophysical characteristics, such as river discharge and land cover change, as well as social traits that include application of water treatment technologies, use of traditional knowledge and importance of subsistence food. The resulting index predicts the overall resilience and vulnerability of communities in Arctic Alaska.
The goal of this study was to develop and apply a conceptual framework for assessing vulnerability of Northern Canadian water resources to permafrost thaw. For this study, water resources are defined as surface hydrological and aquatic chemistry regimes that are characterized by typical water budgets, and water chemistry concentrations and loads. The water budget is an accounting of all inputs and outputs of water into a landscape unit or catchment over a defined period of time, and the resulting change in water storage. Water budget components include precipitation, evapotranspiration, groundwater flow and streamflow, but can be further subdivided (e.g., into rainfall and snowfall). The concentrations of constituents in water (e.g., ions, carbon, nutrients, metals, and sediment) are expressed in mass per volume, and are indicative of water quality. Loads are the mass of these constituents transferred from the catchment via streamflow and groundwater over a period of time and can be expressed per unit area to permit comparison between locations. This framework was applied by taking existing knowledge of water budget and aquatic chemistry response to permafrost thaw and thermokarst and developing a Canadian Water Resources Vulnerability Index to Permafrost Thaw (CWRVIPT). Indicators of both current landscape conditions and potential stressors were ranked by their expected capacity to influence change in water resources and these ranks were used as inputs to calculate an index of vulnerability of an area. Greater expected change to water resources corresponds to higher levels of vulnerability (Chapin et al. 2004). This approach included mapping of the newly developed CWRVIPT index across northern Canada to identify vulnerable areas for future research and adaptation efforts.


Conceptual framework of vulnerability factors within CWRVIPT

Vulnerability is defined here as the degree to which a system is likely to change due to exposure and sensitivity to a specific perturbation (Chapin et al. 2004). In this instance, vulnerability refers to the degree to which water resources, as represented by water budgets, and aquatic chemistry concentrations and loads, are likely to change due to exposure and sensitivity to permafrost thaw. Permafrost is ground (soil or rock and included ice and organic material) that remains at or below 0 °C for at least two consecutive years. It is defined by temperature rather than ice content and some permafrost, for example bedrock, may contain very little ice. However, permafrost commonly contains substantial amounts of ground ice. Permafrost thaw refers to the progressive loss of ground ice in permafrost, usually due to input of heat (IPCC 2019). Progressive thaw with active layer thickening, talik development, and rising of the permafrost base increases hydraulic conductivity and connections between ground and surface waters (e.g., Lamontagne-Hallé et al. 2018), and induces thermokarst where ice-rich ground thaws to produce depressions in the land surface through processes that include soil consolidation and settlement, slumping, gullying, and active layer detachment (Harris et al. 1988).
Environmental factors that influence the vulnerability of water resources to permafrost thaw can be categorized two ways: current landscape conditions and potential stressors (Fig. 1). Current conditions are a function of the landscape and its history and include permafrost and terrain characteristics. These control the sensitivity of water resources to permafrost thaw. When stressors are absent it is assumed that permafrost conditions remain static and there will be no permafrost thaw. Permafrost stressors include climate change and landscape disturbance. When these are present, permafrost warming and thawing, accompanied by thermokarst, occur over space and through time at varying rates.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Flowchart showing the conceptual framework for assessing water resource vulnerability due to permafrost thaw.
Changes in permafrost caused by thaw and thermokarst are associated with several mechanisms that are associated, in turn, with changes in hydrologic and aquatic chemistry regimes. Studies documenting these changes provide insight into which influential factors (both conditions and stressors) were used in the CWRVIPT (Table 1). Furthermore, interactions among hydrologic and aquatic chemistry regimes have cascading effects on aquatic ecology and ecosystem services, which are benefits humans directly gain from functions of the environment that provide, support, and regulate resources (Leemans and de Groot 2005). The interactions among these regimes also effect human water use for domestic and industrial purposes (Fig. 1). The focus of CWRVIPT is on hydrological and aquatic chemistry regimes as defined by typical water budgets, aquatic chemistry concentrations, and loads.
Table 1.
Table 1. Implications of permafrost thaw on water resources in northern Canada.

Note: DOC, dissolved organic carbon; N, nitrogen; TDS, total dissolved solids.


The spatial domain selected for the development and application of the CWRVIPT is the continuous and discontinuous permafrost region of Canada as defined using the circumpolar permafrost and ground ice data set of the National Snow and Ice Data Centre (, a digitized version of the Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground-Ice Conditions (Brown et al. 2002). Glaciers and large lakes (e.g., Great Bear Lake) were exempted because they are dominated by different processes than those represented using the methodological approach. Several large rivers (e.g., Mackenzie and Nelson) that pass through this domain have headwaters outside of the permafrost domain. Changes to streamflow and chemistry in such rivers that emerge from more southern regions may be due to a diversity of factors in addition to those accounted for by CWRVIPT.
The temporal domain of the study is partially a function of data availability. Landscape and permafrost data were compiled over various periods of record with some dating back to the first decade of the 2000s. Climate change impacts are typically assessed using projected differences between a baseline or current period and a future period. In this study, these were 1986–2005 and 2030–2050, respectively. However, it is recognized that permafrost is already responding, and will continue to respond to ongoing and future warming and landscape disturbances. There will be spatial and temporal differences in permafrost and water resources responses to the expected change in climate between 1986–2005 (1990s) and 2030–2050 (2040s), with some impacts taking decades to emerge. Therefore, the exact permafrost and landscape conditions that will exist in the future are not known, and given this, future climate stressors were applied to current permafrost and landscape conditions. For these reasons, the temporal domain for the study was defined as from the 1990s to the 2040s, but it is recognized that both the earlier and later boundaries are uncertain.


The methodological approach to developing CWRVIPT was to collate spatial data of indicators of landscape conditions and overlay these with spatial data of landscape disturbances as well as projected climate information. For each indicator that could be mapped across the domain, a ranking system was developed, which was then used to calculate vulnerability. Similar approaches were used by Allan et al. (2013) and Alessa et al. (2008). Following the framework described above, vulnerability was assessed as the sum of four sub-indices: permafrost conditions (Ip), terrain conditions (It), climate stressors (Ic), and disturbance stressors (Id).
Each sub-index was a function of the ranks of several indicators. Each indicator was selected based on two main criteria: (i) that it has a significant impact on permafrost thaw and consequently water resources (Table 1), and (ii) that a pan-Canadian spatial data set exists (Table 2). The latter criterion eliminates some potential indicators, such as the influence of groundwater on permafrost thaw. Each indicator was selected because it has been documented as a factor controlling how water budgets or chemistry respond to permafrost thaw. How much control each indicator has on water resource vulnerability was ranked on a spectrum from relatively resilient (0) to vulnerable (1). Ranking divisions were also based on the classification, magnitude, or amount of variation of that indicator. Some vulnerability indices apply a weight to the ranks of each indicator and index based upon perceived influence (Allan et al. 2013). However, due to the difficulty of objectively determining which indices and indicators are more important, no weights were assigned to the ranks in this assessment. Instead, each sub-index was the average of the rank of each indicator so that no single indicator biased the overall index (see Alessa et al. 2008). When indicators and sub-indices had multiple components, the arithmetic mean of these components was calculated to ensure they were treated as a single combined value. This prevented biasing the index due to higher values associated with data availability.
Table 2.
Table 2. Data sources for each indicator.

Note: DEW, distant early warning; MAAT, mean annual air temperature.

Permafrost conditions

The permafrost conditions sub-index was calculated following:
Ranks denoting permafrost extent (Pz) were associated with permafrost zones used in the Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground-Ice Conditions (Heginbottom and Dubreuil 1993; Brown et al. 2002). This defines zones of continuous permafrost as those areas with 90%–100% spatial extent, discontinuous permafrost from 50% to 90%, sporadic from 10% to 50% and isolated between 0% and 10%. Although the concept of permafrost zones has been very useful at coarse scales, its major disadvantage is that it conceals finer scale heterogeneity. Furthermore, because of a lack of ground temperature measurements in many remote areas, zonal boundaries are also informed by air temperatures. These have increased since the late 20th century, introducing further uncertainty into the mapped zones. Gruber (2012) developed a permafrost zonation index from updated climate and terrain data at a finer scale of 1 km2, which is applied here.
The potential of permafrost thaw to introduce new hydrological pathways and connectivity, or thermokarst features that change drainage networks (Table 1), is inherently related to its extent. In general, vulnerability due to permafrost thaw increases with decreasing permafrost extent (Zhang et al. 2008) because the permafrost becomes warmer and thinner and it is likely to cause more landscape changes than merely an increase in active-layer thickness (as occurs in continuous permafrost). This spatial dimension has implications for water flow pathways, streamflow seasonality and chemistry (Petrone et al. 2006; O’Donnell et al. 2012; Connon et al. 2014) and has been attributed to differences in rates of lake drainage (Smith et al. 2005; Karlsson et al. 2012). This implies that where the permafrost zonation index is between 50% and 90% (i.e., discontinuous) water resources are most vulnerable to permafrost thaw. The next most vulnerable areas were identified as those where the index ranges from 10% to 50% (i.e., sporadic). Although thaw may not result in complete disappearance of continuous permafrost, even subtle changes in active-layer depth can have profound impacts on water chemistry (Lewis et al. 2012; Lafrenière and Lamoureux 2013; Farquarson et al. 2019). This can have widespread effects on water resources because the frozen ground is so extensive (>90%) (Tables 3 and 4). Where there is almost no likelihood for permafrost (<10%, i.e., isolated), we assumed that its thaw will not be significant to water resources response at the landscape scale.
Table 3.
Table 3. Canadian Water Resource Vulnerability to Permafrost Thaw Index (CWRVIPT): individual indicators within each sub-index.

Note: DEW, distant early warning; MAAT, mean annual air temperature.

Table 4.
Table 4. Rank values used as part of the Canadian Water Resource Vulnerability to Permafrost Thaw Index (CWRVIPT).

Note: Symbols denoting surficial geology sediments are as follows: A, alluvium; C, colluvium; E, eolian; GFc, ice contact sediments; GFp, outwash plains; GLn, nearshore and littoral glaciolacustrine; GLo, offshore glaciolacustrine; GMn, littoral and nearshore glaciomarine; GMo, offshore glaciomarine; Mo, offshore marine; O, organics; R, exposed bedrock; T, tills; V, exposed bedrock; W, undifferentiated weathered bedrock and regolith; and Wv, regolith veneer. Symbols denoting bedrock geology rock types include: CS, conglomerates and sandstones; D, Devonian carbonate; I, intrusive rocks; n, gneiss; S, sedimentary rocks; SV, sedimentary and volcanic rocks; V, volcanic rocks; and Z, Proterozoic evaporite. DEW, distant early warning; MAAT, mean annual air temperature.

Ground ice content (Ci) ranks were based on estimates of relative abundance of excess ground ice from O’Neill et al. (2019) (Table 2). Ground ice content controls the amount of water that is hypothesized to be a source of increased streamflow by providing moisture inputs that were previously bound as ice (Connon et al. 2014). These inputs are expected to manifest as higher subsurface flows. The presence of wedge ice increases the likelihood of lateral breaching of lakeshores, catastrophic lake drainage (Pohl et al. 2009; Jones et al. 2011), and subsequent changes in surface storage capacity and drainage network structure. These findings imply those areas with higher ground ice content have water resources that are more vulnerable to permafrost thaw (Table 3). This is a similar approach to that used by Olefeldt et al. (2016) in a thermokarst landscape classification study. There are three common types of excess ground ice: relict, segregated, and wedge, and each can occur in high, medium, low, and negligible fractions (O’Neill et al. 2019). Ice abundance is not equal for each fractional category. For example, areas of high density wedge ice abundance may occupy 3.5%–16% of the upper 5–6 m of permafrost (Pollard and French 1980; Couture and Pollard 1998), whereas segregated ice may commonly exceed this volume (Pollard and French 1980). Relict ice, where present, may represent areas of highest relative ground ice abundance (Couture and Pollard 1998) as evidenced by extensive retrogressive thaw slumping (Kokelj et al. 2017) owing to its high ice content and spatial distribution. Vulnerability was assessed for the relative contribution of each ground ice type according to its abundance (high, medium, low, and negligible) (Table 4) whereby the maximum value of the summed contributions was equal to 1. The actual ranks were summed for each type of ground ice so that Ci is equal to:
where Wi, Si, and Ri are the wedge ice, segregated ice, and relict ice ranks, respectively.

Terrain conditions

The terrain sub-index was calculated as:
Data to assess overburden (O) and surficial geology (Gs) ranks came from Fulton (1995) (Table 2), which details the mapping of surficial geology across Canada. Two classes of overburden thickness were recognized: (i) thin (veneer), and (ii) thick (all other types). Thin overburden indicates a lower potential for significant landscape and water resource regime changes with permafrost thaw (Lamoureux and Lafrenière 2009; Dugan et al. 2012; Kokelj and Jorgenson 2013), and thus was considered resilient (ranked as 0; Table 3). Thick overburden was ranked as 1 (Table 4). The influence of surficial geology on water resources vulnerability is a function of hydraulic conductivity and particle size (Smith and Burgess 1999; Olefeldt et al. 2016) as subsurface flow can accelerate permafrost thaw (McKenzie and Voss 2013; Lamontagne-Hallé et al. 2018). For example, offshore glaciolacustrine deposits are finer than glaciofluvial deposits, with the former provided a ranking of 0.2 and the latter 1. Sands and gravels from weathered bedrock were ranked as more vulnerable (0.7) than low conductivity till deposits (0.5) (Table 4). Similarly, higher conductivity associated with bedrock geology (Gb) would result in a larger response in subsurface pathways, rates of subsurface flow, and potential changes in chemistry as pore space and fractures become available to transmit water with permafrost thaw (Carey and Woo 2001; Walvoord and Striegl 2007). Using Freeze and Cherry (1979) and bedrock geology data from Wheeler et al. (1997) higher hydraulic conductivity bedrock was deemed relatively more vulnerable (Table 4).
Water resources in areas with thicker organic layers are expected to be more vulnerable to change because the thaw of any frozen ground in these areas would result in more profound changes to water budgets and chemistry than in areas with thinner organic layers (Carey and Woo 2001; Buffam et al. 2007; Walvoord and Striegl 2007) (Tables 3 and 4). As no pan-Canadian database of organic layer thickness exists, soil organic carbon content from the Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (Hugelius et al. 2013) can be used as a proxy because it should correlate with thicker organic layers (Olefeldt et al. 2016). The required soil organic carbon content ranks (Cs) were calculated from bulk density, organic carbon percentage, soil depth, and fraction of coarse fragments and (or) segregated ice content characteristics of representative soil types in northern Canada and extrapolated by appending data to an existing soil type map of Canada (Tarnocai and Lacelle 1996).
Assessing vegetation-permafrost-hydrology-biogeochemistry interactions must include a representation of land cover (Jorgenson et al. 2013). Evaporation rates can differ among land cover types associated with permafrost extent and ground ice type (Wright et al. 2009; Raz-Yassef et al. 2017). If vegetation type distribution associated with permafrost thaw is extensive enough, regional evapotranspiration rates could be altered. The role of land cover on water resource vulnerability to permafrost thaw was assessed using a product from the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) (Table 2). The original 31 categories in the database were re-classified into four: (i) forests, (ii) tree line transition, (iii) shrubs and low vegetation cover, and (iv) exposed rock. Wetland presence was calculated using the Global Surface Water data set (Table 2) because although the CCRS data included several wetland categories, these include both wetlands and shrubs and so were not considered to be appropriate for northern Canada. The land cover rank, L, was calculated using ranks of each land cover. Forests were ranked as less vulnerable to permafrost thaw-induced water resource change as they protect permafrost by shading the ground surface (Jorgenson et al. 2010). The tree line transition was identified as a separate land cover type because of its distinct mixture of tundra, trees and, importantly, expanding shrubs that can influence ground thermal conditions (Liston et al. 2002; Lawrence and Swenson 2011). Exposed bedrock was ranked the least vulnerable of the land cover types. Wetlands can be particularly vulnerable (Wright et al. 2009; Quinton et al. 2011; Connon et al. 2014) so wherever the Global Surface Water data set indicated wetland presence, another 0.3 was added to L (Tables 3 and 4).
The only portion of Canada that contains yedoma (organic rich permafrost with 50%–90% ice) is in central Yukon (Wolfe et al. 2009) (Table 2). Areas with yedoma (Y) were ranked highly vulnerable (i.e., 1) because of higher likelihood of excess ground ice (Tables 3 and 4) and extensive thermokarst, and thus a high potential for significant landscape change (Strauss et al. 2017). The large contiguity of yedoma regions in the Yukon make them significant due to the potential for widespread re-mobilization of organic carbon (Strauss et al. 2017), which can impact regional-scale water quality when permafrost degrades.
Relief (R) categories and data were obtained from Gruber (2012) (Table 2). The most vulnerable areas (i.e., 1) were flat (zonation index of 1.5–0) (Tables 3 and 4) because of possible subsidence, inundation and changing drainage network structure. This may also alter subsurface pathways with implications for water chemistry (Sannel and Kuhry 2011). Hilly and undulating areas (zonation index from 3.5 to 1.5) were intermediately ranked as they are more susceptible to hillslope thermokarst processes and associated changes these may have on water chemistry. Rugged areas were ranked less vulnerable (Table 4) as they are less likely to have significant amounts of ground ice (Gruber and Haeberli 2009), as are wetlands or lakes (Olefeldt et al. 2016).

Climate stressors

This sub-index (Ic) focuses on stress due to projected climate change on permafrost and associated impacts on water resources. The climate data consists of monthly averages of precipitation and temperature from an ensemble of 29 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)5 climate models using the representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5 emission scenario, which represents a “business as usual” scenario based on current global greenhouse gas emissions (Environment and Climate Change Canada 2018). The data sets are at a 1° spatial resolution across Canada and matched to the land areas, but are bounded between 50° and 80°N and 50° and 140°W, which reduces the size of the domain from the maximum extent of permafrost on Canada’s land mass. The 50th percentile of the 29 CMIP5 models was employed in our assessment to represent the average projection from all climate models. Individual indicators were calculated from monthly, seasonal, or annual precipitation and temperature data. All climate ranks were a function of the change between the near future (2031–2050) and current conditions (1986–2005). For the purposes of sub-dividing the indicators and providing rank values, the range of climate indicators was based on the greatest amount of change between current and near-future values. For each indicator, 11 quantiles were calculated, using the first and last to isolate the upper and lower extremes (Table 2). The range between the two quantiles was equally divided into 9 ranges to fill the rankings from 0.1 to 0.9 (Table 4). Ic was calculated for the near future period as:
Air temperature (T) and precipitation (P) were the two selected climate parameters, with specific indicators within each. Four key aspects of temperature change were considered, which affect the amount and timing of heat exchange between the atmosphere and the land surface (Table 1). An increase in mean annual air temperature (MAAT) results in initiation of permafrost thaw, increasing summer thaw depth, deepening of the active layer, and reduction of the extent of frozen ground (Rinke et al. 2012). Warmer winter temperatures (average of December to February; Tw) diminish ground cooling necessary to maintain permafrost and can prevent complete freezing of the active layer, which is especially important over warm permafrost within which connectivity can be maintained (Smith et al. 2012; Connon et al. 2014). An increase in summer temperature (average of June to August; Ts) can be associated with higher evapotranspiration rates. It also increases ground temperatures and active-layer thickness and with all else being equal will lead to higher ground temperatures the following winter (Rinke et al. 2012). Warmer soil is associated with enhanced chemical cycling (Koch et al. 2013) and a higher likelihood of subsurface hydrological connectivity (Walvoord and Striegl 2007). Extremely warm summer temperatures can precondition areas for, or trigger, thermokarst processes, such as active-layer detachments that impact water chemistry (Dugan et al. 2012; Lewkowicz and Way 2019). Longer open-water season (annual ice-free duration of waterbody surfaces; D) permit higher heat storage in lakes, which may delay winter freeze-up dates (Barnhart et al. 2016), permitting higher rates of heat conduction between waterbodies and the adjacent ground. This heat conduction can increase near-surface ground temperatures in areas below water bodies by up to 10 °C more than MAAT (Jorgenson et al. 2010). These examples demonstrate how multiple temperature indicators are necessary to capture the different ways in which climate warming can influence permafrost thaw and subsequent water resource response. Ranks for MAAT, Tw, Ts, and D were all calculated similarly. The greatest increase was considered the most vulnerable (1) and lowest change the least vulnerable (0), with sub-rankings within this range calculated following the quantile method described above. Ranks for D were established in the same way with values approximated by determining the duration of each calendar year when air temperatures were above 0 °C.
Precipitation is an important stressor on permafrost as it generates potential for soil saturation, low basal shear strength, and erosion (Lewkowicz 2007; Lamoureux and Lafrenière 2009; Kokelj et al. 2013), or in the form of snow, it acts as an important ground insulator (e.g., Stieglitz et al. 2003). The two indicators included were late summer rain (August precipitation; PA) and annual snowfall (PW). Rain is more likely to influence runoff chemical concentrations and loads during late summer when thaw depths are greatest. This increases the likelihood of rapid permafrost thaw (Rinke et al. 2012), rapid drainage of thermokarst lakes (Pohl et al. 2009) or hillslope thermokarst formations (Lewis et al. 2005; Lewkowicz and Harris 2005; Lacelle et al. 2010), each of which can have significant sudden impacts on water budgets, sediment concentrations and loads to nearby waterbodies (Lewis et al. 2012; Lafrenière and Lamoureux 2013). These are responses to individual runoff events, when rain is heavy and evaporation is limited, but changes in drainage networks or movements of large volumes of sediment can have long lasting repercussions for water chemistry and streamflow production (Kokelj et al. 2013). August precipitation was selected because it is the latest month in which precipitation could be reasonably assumed to be entirely composed of rainfall across the entire spatial domain. PA was ranked such that an increase indicates permafrost is more vulnerable, whereas a decrease may indicate more resilience to change. The greatest increase in rainfall was ranked most vulnerable (1) and any decrease or no change in rainfall ranked as least vulnerable (0) with sub-rankings determined by the same quantile approach as with temperature.
The length of the period during which air temperature is below 0 °C was used to estimate when precipitation would fall as snow, a necessary step because the climate data set does not differentiate precipitation phase. Annual approximate snowfall (PW) calculated in this way was summed and averaged for each time period. The quantile approach was applied, but because there are both projected increases and decreases in Pw, quantiles were aligned so that no change was given a value of zero. Snowfall is an indicator of ground insulation during winter (Rinke et al. 2012) with higher amounts reducing ground cooling (Stieglitz et al. 2003) leading to increasing thaw depths in spring and summer (Walvoord and Kurylyk 2016), which has implications for opening and sustaining subsurface pathways for runoff. Less snow is expected to increase the resiliency of the permafrost. Proportional increases and decreases in snowfall were used with the greatest increase at 0.7, the greatest decrease at −0.3, and no change at 0.

Disturbance stressors

The disturbance sub-index was calculated following:
where HP is human presence (HP = 1 if presence = “yes”, otherwise = 0) and FP is fire potential as:
The HP disturbances considered were roads, mines, oil and gas wells, pipelines, communities, and distant early warning (DEW) line sites (Table 2). The response of water resources, specifically runoff chemistry, to these disruptions depends on the degree of permafrost thaw, particularly in discontinuous permafrost (Williams et al. 2013). Linear disturbances, such as roads (Huntington et al. 2007; Wolfe et al. 2015), pipelines (Smith et al. 2008), and seismic lines (Williams et al. 2013), affect the ecosystem that may be providing protection for permafrost. Disruptions include vegetation clearing, overburden removal, drainage alteration, artificially warming or cooling the ground, and surface water management. These activities melt ground ice, change snow accumulation, and alter drainage networks through subsidence. For example, soil moisture commonly increases along roads due to blockage of runoff by embankments and the energy advected with this water results in earlier active layer thaw (Williams et al. 2013). Mines and oil and gas wells are areas of increased permafrost vulnerability, as vegetation is cleared, and overburden is commonly removed allowing for more direct radiative fluxes that encourage permafrost thaw (Cao et al. 2016). Active on-site water management for operations changes water surface pathways, chemistry, and runoff rates. Pipeline corridors are another linear disturbance as permafrost thaw and settlement occurs due to alteration of the ground thermal regime (Smith et al. 2008), with implications for water resources, specifically water budgets. The impact of constructing a right-of-way for a pipeline or seismic line on ground temperatures can outweigh climate warming impacts for several years after construction (Smith and Riseborough 2010). Communities impact permafrost through vegetation changes, surface disturbances, and development (Huntington et al. 2007), whereas DEW line sites may also cause contamination (Thomas et al. 1992; Poland et al. 2001). Disturbed areas were ranked as vulnerable (i.e., 1) with all other areas ranked as 0. Disturbed locations were imported as point or line data and subsequently buffered by 100 m. No attempt was made to predict disturbances associated with future development.
The influence of climate warming will dominate that of forest fire to reduce permafrost extent over time (Zhang et al. 2015), but forest fire can reduce thin, discontinuous permafrost extent by 16% or more (Yoshikawa et al. 2002; Gibson et al. 2018). Fire accelerates permafrost thaw because the loss of insulation with organic soils allows for a thicker active layer that is less likely to recover as the climate warms (Yoshikawa et al. 2002; Holloway et al. 2020). The deepening of the active layer, or loss of permafrost altogether with fire, opens previously unavailable pathways to groundwater that can change streamflow seasonality and chemistry. Forest fire disturbance was represented in CWRVIPT with a form of fire weather index (Van Wagner 1987) based on summer temperature (Ts) and summer precipitation (Ps). Its application was limited spatially to forested areas. Using the same climate data described above for use in Ic, the change in summer precipitation between time periods was compared, and areas with the smallest increase were ranked as most vulnerable (Ps = 1) and areas with greatest increase were most resilient (Ps = 0). The same method to derive values of summer temperature ranks (Ts) using quantiles used from the Ic for summer temperature was used for FP. The arithmetic mean of the two indicators constituted FP (eq. (9)).

Results and discussion

Landscape conditions

Figure 2a illustrates the spatial distribution of the values of permafrost conditions (Ip), which increase northward from the southernmost edge of permafrost. The highest values occur across a wide swath extending from Ungava Bay in Québec through the Hudson Bay Lowlands, northwest past the southern shores of Great Bear Lake towards the Peel Plateau in Northwest Territories. A portion of the Mackenzie Mountains has relatively lower values because of low ground ice. Variation within these predominant spatial trends is due to the presence of water bodies and ground ice. Regions with continuous permafrost and low ground ice (e.g., large parts of Baffin Island) contrast regions with extensive areas that contain all three types of massive ground ice (e.g., Banks and Victoria Islands) (O’Neill et al. 2019), which enhances values of CWRVIPT. This highlights the result that the presence of continuous permafrost does not necessarily result in lower values of CWRVIPT.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of the sub-indices (a) permafrost conditions, Ip; (b) terrain conditions, It; (c) climate stressors, Ic; and (d) landscape disturbance, Id. Note: the inset map in (d) is an area in northwestern Alberta denoted by the black rectangle. Maps were created using ESRI ArcGIS 10.6.1. The domain outline is from Brown et al. (2002) and is available from
Calculation of terrain conditions (It) incorporates the greatest number of indicators of all the sub-indices, which results in the most spatial variation although broad scale patterns exist (Fig. 2b). Values of It are lowest in the mountainous regions of the three territories and Labrador because of high relief and widespread exposed bedrock. The moderate relief, thin overburden, and exposed bedrock landscapes of the Canadian Shield in mainland Nunavut and the Ungava Peninsula in northern Québec exhibit values from 0.4 to 0.5. Portions of Baffin Island display values as high as 0.6 due to thicker overburden and low relief. This combination of characteristics that result in values that can exceed 0.7 also occurs across much of the Hudson Bay Lowlands and the Mackenzie River Valley in the Northwest Territories.
The sum of It and Ip, which could be considered as the sensitivity of water resources to permafrost thaw, is highest in two regions that have values approaching 1.5. The first extends from the northern Yukon south towards the southern Northwest Territories. The second is in northern Manitoba. The highest values generally occur in flatter regions of warm ice-rich discontinuous permafrost with widespread organic soils. Values around 1.0, in northern regions of Québec and Labrador are comparable with those in northern Alberta and Manitoba. Values in the Ungava Peninsula and much of mainland Nunavut are lower because the thinner coarser overburden contains less ground ice and is less susceptible to thaw-induced thermokarst (Olefeldt et al. 2016). Combined values of Ip and It as low as 0.2 occur in the mountainous regions of northern Baffin Island. In contrast, Banks and Victoria Islands, at a similar latitude, have higher values due to high ground ice contents.

Climate stressors

The influence of climate stress on water resource vulnerability to permafrost thaw is most pronounced on Victoria Island, northern Baffin Island, and the region south of the Queen Maud Gulf. In these areas, Ic exceeds 0.6 (Fig. 2c) primarily because of higher winter temperatures and greater precipitation. Ic values tend to decrease towards Ellesmere Island, and to the southwest towards the Northwest Territories and Yukon. Instances that deviate from this trend occur in northern Québec, the Hudson Bay coastline of Manitoba, northwest Alberta, areas west of Great Bear Lake, and the northern Yukon. These areas exhibit high Ic values that range from 0.5 to 0.7.

Landscape disturbance stressors

Stressors associated with HP can only be detected at the scale of the entire study domain in a few locations. One of these is in northern Alberta where the network of pipelines and roads is extensive (Fig. 2d) and values of Id are as high 0.7. It is possible that the ecosystem processes that protected permafrost in northern Alberta have already been removed from these locations of landscape disturbance, so the impacts on water resources may have already happened. The FP is zero in arctic and alpine landscapes, so stressors identified in these areas are limited to locations with HP disturbances. More frequent forest fire disturbance is predicted south of 60°N particularly in northern Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and in Ontario west of James Bay, where FP is at a maximum of 0.4.

Estimates of CWRVIPT

Figure 3 illustrates the results of applying eq. (1) to assess the vulnerability of water resources via permafrost thaw into the middle of the 21st century (from where data can be downloaded is described in Supplementary File S11). The patterns exhibited in Fig. 2 are projected to continue into the future with enhanced vulnerability across a wide swath of the Northwest Territories, and northern Manitoba, and Ontario. Values of CWRVIPT indicate regions of higher vulnerability south of Hudson Bay, portions of central Nunavut, and southwest of Great Bear Lake (Fig. 3). Relatively high CWRVIPT values in central Baffin Island, western Victoria Island, and portions of central Nunavut can be attributed to high Ic (Fig. 2c). The Mackenzie Mountains, and portions of the Boothia Peninsula are relatively less vulnerable. Mountainous regions of Baffin Island also have low CWRVIPT values, due to very low values of It, Ip, and Id. In contrast, the Ic values in these regions are among the highest (0.75) and dominate final CWRVIPT values (see Fig. 2c). The high Ic values are due to projected increases in winter air temperatures and summer precipitation. Vulnerability values averaged 0.8 ± 0.3 using only a combination of It and Ip, but the average increased to 1.3 ± 0.3 when climate and disturbance stressors were added. The increase across the entire pan-Canadian domain was almost exclusively attributable to climate stress.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Spatial distribution of CWRVIPT. The map was created in ESRI ArcGIS 10.6.1. The domain outline is from Brown et al. (2002) and is available from

Evaluation of CWRVIPT

The values assigned in Table 4 are admittedly only informed estimates. For this reason, an evaluation of CWRVIPT is important. However, this is challenging because there is a paucity of large-scale data concerning water resource change across Canada that could be used to evaluate CWRVIPT at scales beyond individual headwater catchments or landscapes. Studies of this type have taken place in Siberia and Alaska using satellite observations or widespread water chemistry monitoring networks (e.g., Smith et al. 2005; Lyon and Destouni 2010). The few comparable studies in Canada that discuss implications on water resources include Li Yung Lung et al. (2018) who, in a synoptic analysis of chemical loads from the Canadian land mass to the Arctic Ocean, demonstrated that sparse regional aquatic chemistry data make evaluation difficult. Lantz and Kokelj (2008) detected an increase in thaw slump density across the uplands adjacent to the Mackenzie Delta in the latter half of the 20th century. Similarly, Marsh et al. (2009) documented changes in the rate of catastrophic lake drainage associated with thawing and thermokarst across an area east of the Mackenzie Delta. Follow-up research documented widespread water chemistry impacts (Deison et al. 2012) but these results are geographically limited to one landscape among many within the study domain. Lantz and Turner (2015) determined that thermokarst and catastrophic drainage were responsible for half the lakes that experienced a change in area in a portion of Old Crow Flats, Yukon between 1951 and 2007. They suggested that further research was needed on the mechanisms and conditions that cause catastrophic drainage to extrapolate findings wider afield. This also demonstrates that evaluation data are limited.
One approach to systematically evaluate CWRVIPT is to select the most sensitive areas based on permafrost and terrain conditions and examine if these have experienced changes in water resources. The most sensitive areas are those in the top quartile of the combined value of It and Ip (i.e., >0.964). Where the sum of It and Ip exceeded 0.964, the higher of the two sub-indices was mapped (Fig. 4). Permafrost conditions generally matter more in the discontinuous permafrost zone with areas of medium ground ice abundance than terrain in the continuous permafrost zone where ground ice abundance is high. Expected water resource responses in these regions include changes in drainage network structure and surface storage due to ground ice melt and subsidence as well as changes in chemical fluxes associated with mass movement (Table 1). These responses are especially associated with thermokarst development. Areas where Ip dominates CWRVIPT align well with areas of high retrogressive thaw slump density and changes in water chemistry in the northern Yukon, northern mainland Northwest Territories, and portions of Banks and Victoria Islands (Kokelj et al. 2017). These locations are associated with the margins of the late Wisconsinan ice sheet and have high concentrations of relict ice (Kokelj et al. 2013). Thaw slumps increase total suspended solids by orders of magnitude and double specific conductivity in water bodies immediately downslope, and can increase summer SO4/Cl ratios hundreds of kilometers downstream. Such thaw slumps also have the potential to cause substantial change to the biological composition and food web structure of lakes and rivers (Moquin et al. 2014; Chin et al. 2016).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Extent of upper quantile values of the sum of It and Ip (>0.964). The two colours differentiate the distribution of the larger of the two components. The red circle denotes the location of the Scotty Creek watershed. The map was created in ESRI ArcGIS 10.6.1. The domain outline is from Brown et al. (2002) and is available from
Terrain plays a dominant role in water resource vulnerability where relief is limited, wetlands are common, and there is high soil organic carbon content (Fig. 4). These factors control the active layer thickness and the areal extent of frozen ground, altering runoff pathways by opening previously inaccessible subsurface routes. Runoff chemistry changes as minerals and solutes available to runoff are impacted (Table 1). Scotty Creek watershed, southeast of Fort Simpson, Northwest Territories, is within a region in which CWRVIPT values are near their highest and It values dominate (Fig. 4). This is an area of thick organic soils, flat terrain, numerous wetlands, and discontinuous permafrost with specific land cover types associated with permafrost presence. Bogs and fens tend to be permafrost-free, whereas peat plateaus contain permafrost, and the latter decreased 40% between 1947 and 2008 throughout the Scotty Creek basin (Quinton et al. 2011). Loss of this land cover type and the permafrost associated with it can open up previously inaccessible portions of the subsurface to groundwater flow (Connon et al. 2015). Associated with this extensive permafrost thaw, and changing structural hydrological connectivity, regional runoff ratios and annual streamflow have been increasing steadily since 1970 at a rate between 4% and 10% annually due to landscape changes and not precipitation (Connon et al. 2014).
A second example of links between It and water resource vulnerability concerns permafrost thaw and runoff in winter. St. Jacques and Sauchyn (2009) hypothesized that permafrost thaw was responsible for widespread increases in winter baseflow across the Northwest Territories, citing work by Smith et al. (2007) and Walvoord and Striegl (2007) that implied that this shift must be due to higher flows along better connected groundwater pathways. Limited data show a strong positive correlation between It and changes in winter baseflow between the mid-1970s and mid-2000s (r = 0.91) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. It and documented increase in winter baseflow across catchments in the Northwest Territories. The correlation (r = 0.91) is statistically significant (p = 0.05). Data on changes in winter baseflow are selected from St. Jacques and Sauchyn (2009) and show catchments that exhibited statistically significant increases in winter baseflow, excluding outliers (increases in baseflow of >100%/year) and catchments containing lakes that would provide a large portion of winter baseflow.
Ic and Id were not as extensively predominant in the CWRVIPT as It and Ip. However, Ic was the predominant sub-index in portions of the High Arctic and northern Québec (see Fig. 2c). These areas could be interpreted as more resilient to climate change because greater change in climate is required to induce vulnerability due to colder and more extensive permafrost. In areas where permafrost and terrain conditions are the predominant controls, less climate change may be required to induce an impact or exhibit tipping points, and they may already be exhibiting widespread changes in water resources (e.g., St. Jacques and Sauchyn 2009; Kokelj et al. 2017). Id was the highest sub-index only along the southern reaches of the permafrost zone in locations of HP (see Fig. 2d). This indicates changes to water resources associated with permafrost thaw in these areas may be dependent on land use decisions (e.g., seismic line intensity).
Some potentially important factors could not be included or were represented by proxies (e.g., soil organic carbon content) in CWRVIPT due to a lack of data. For example, groundwater discharge areas are more prone to permafrost thaw and are especially important for maintaining water levels within wetlands and lakes (Yoshikawa and Hinzman 2003). These are not represented in CWRVIPT, which therefore underestimates vulnerability in these areas. Seismic cut lines created during hydrocarbon exploration are also known to lead to permafrost thaw (Williams et al. 2013), but were excluded to prevent spatial bias linked to incomplete data coverage.
Figure 3 represents a first attempt at characterizing the vulnerability of water resources to permafrost thaw across northern Canada. The caveats described above, especially the basic information gaps, must be considered when interpreting and applying the index. Further evaluation is needed at a variety of locations across a spectrum of CWRVIPT values to confirm if higher values are associated with greater impact or larger changes in water resources. Larger changes should be reflected in metrics, such as stronger trends or step changes in streamflow or solute concentrations. The CWRVIPT could be developed further in an iterative manner. The first step would be to identify expected hot spots of change and (or) uncertainty from existing results and prioritize those areas for observation and research. The results of this field research could inform and improve ranking schemes used to derive CWRVIPT. A second step would be to apply numerical hydrological and biogeochemistry models to see if they reproduce changes that align with spatial patterns of CWRVIPT. Risk results from the interaction of vulnerability, exposure, and hazard (Oppenheimer et al. 2014) and is often expressed as the probability of occurrence of hazardous events, or trends multiplied by impacts if these events occur. Therefore, CWRVIPT could represent a measure of vulnerability used in an analysis of specific risks to communities, aquatic species or ecosystems, environmental services, infrastructure and natural resource developments in northern Canada.


This represents the first evaluation of the relative vulnerability of water resources across Canada to permafrost thaw by assessing how multiple stressors could combine to affect vulnerability of water resources. The derived CWRVIPT index indicates that southern portions of permafrost regions are vulnerable as is a large swath of the western Northwest Territories extending into the continuous permafrost zone. In these areas, organic terrain and ground ice, respectively, raise the vulnerability of water resources to permafrost thaw. Expected changes in precipitation and winter temperatures on Baffin and Victoria Islands make these more northerly areas vulnerable into the 21st century. Evaluation of the terrain and permafrost sub-indices imply they represent realistic vulnerabilities as they identify areas where terrain controls widespread expansion of subsurface runoff pathways and permafrost traits control expansive changes in thermokarst slumping and water chemistry.
This study provides a framework for further pan-Canadian-scale assessments of water resource vulnerability to permafrost thaw. The results represent a hypothesis to be tested with focused observation and research. With improved understanding and data, future work could incorporate the role of feedbacks and thresholds on the effect of permafrost thaw on Canadian water resources. The CWRVIPT index, if modified in this way, could be used to independently evaluate regional model estimates of change in hydrological regimes, and reduce uncertainty in identifying at-risk priority areas that may require stronger adaptation measures. There are also opportunities to apply the framework further and identify areas where aquatic ecology and biodiversity are vulnerable.


The authors would like to thank Steve Kokelj, Trevor Lantz, Sharon Smith, and Brendan O’Neill for their insight and suggestions during the compilation of the index. Funding was provided by Environment and Climate Change Canada. Spatial data of CWRVIPT are available from the Environment and Climate Change Data Catalogue at We would like to thank the editors and two reviewers for providing valuable input that improved the manuscript.


Supplementary material is available with the article through the journal Web site at Supplementary Material.


Abbott B.W., Jones J.B., Godsey S.E., Larouche J.R., and Bowden W.B. 2015. Patterns and persistence of hydrologic carbon and nutrient export from collapsing upland permafrost. Biogeosciences, 12: 3725–3740.
Alessa L., Kilskey A., Lammers R., Arp C., White D., Hinzman L., and Busey R. 2008. The Arctic Water Resource Vulnerability Index: an integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater. Environ. Manage. 42: 523–541.
Allan J.D., McIntyre P.B., Smith S.D.P., Halpern B.S., Boyer G.L., Buchsbaum A., et al. 2013. Joint analysis of stressors and ecosystem services to enhance restoration effectiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110: 372–377.
Barnhart K.R., Miller C.R., Overeem I., and Kay J.E. 2016. Mapping the future expansion of Arctic open water. Nat. Clim. Change, 6: 280–285.
Bowden W.B., Gooseff M.N., Balser A., Green A., Peteron B.J., and Bradford J. 2008. Sediment and nutrient delivery from thermokarst features in the foothills of the North Slope, Alaska: potential impacts on headwater stream ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 113: G02026.
Box J.E., Colgan W.T., Christensen T.R., Schmidt N.M., Lund M., Parmentier F.-J.W., et al. 2019. Key indicators of Arctic climate change: 1971–2017. Environ. Res. Lett. 14: 045010.
Brown, J., Ferrians, O., Heginbottom, J.A., and Melnikov, E. 2002. Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground-ice conditions, version 2. [Indicate subset used]. National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Boulder, Colo., USA. Available from [accessed March 2018].
Buffam I., Laudon H., Temnerud J., Mörth C.M., and Bishop K. 2007. Landscape-scale variability of acidity and dissolved organic carbon during spring flood in a boreal stream network. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 112: G01022.
Bush, E., Gillett, N., Bonsal, B., Cohen, S., Derksen, C., Flato, G., et al. 2019. Executive summary: Canada’s climate change report. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. 17 p.
Cao W., Sheng Y., Wu J., Li J., Li J., and Chou Y. 2016. Simulation analysis of the impact of excavation backfill on permafrost recovery in an opencast coal-mining pit. Environ. Earth Sci. 75: 837.
Carey S.K. and Woo M. 2001. Slope runoff processes and flow generation in a subarctic, subalpine catchment. J. Hydrol. 253: 110–129.
Chapin F.S., Peterson G., Berkes F., Callaghan T.V., Angelstam P., Apps M., et al. 2004. Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change. Ambio, 33: 344–349.
Chin K., Lento J., Culp J.M., and Kokelj S.V. 2016. Permafrost thaw and intense thermokarst activity decreases abundance of stream benthic macroinvertebrates. Global Change Biol. 22: 2715–2728.
Connon R.F., Quinton W.L., Craig J.R., and Hayashi M. 2014. Changing hydrologic connectivity due to permafrost thaw in the lower Liard River valley, NWT, Canada. Hydrol. Processes, 28: 4163–4178.
Connon R.F., Quinton W.L., Craig J.R., Hanisch J., and Sonnentag O. 2015. The hydrology of interconnected bog complexes in discontinuous permafrost terrains. Hydrol. Processes, 29: 3831–3847.
Couture, N.J., and Pollard, W.H. 1998. An assessment of ground ice volume near Eureka, Northwest Territories. In Permafrost: Seventh International Conference Proceedings, Yellowknife, N.W.T., Canada. Collection Nordicana No. 55, 23–27 June. pp. 195–200.
Deison R., Smol J.P., Kokelj S.V., Pisaric M.F., Kimpe L.E., Poulain A.J., et al. 2012. Spatial and temporal assessment of mercury and organic matter in thermokarst affected lakes of the Mackenzie Delta Uplands, NT, Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(16): 8748–8755.
Derksen, C., Burgess, D., Duguay, C., Howell, S., Mudryk, L., Smith, S., et al. 2019. Changes in snow, ice, and permafrost across Canada. In Canada’s changing climate report. Edited by E. Bush and D.S. Lemmen. Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. Chapter 5, pp. 194–260.
Déry S.J., Hernandez-Henriquez M.A., Burford J.E., and Wood E.F. 2009. Observational evidence of an intensifying hydrological cycle in northern Canada. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36: L13402.
Dugan H.A., Lamoureux S.F., Lewis T., and Lafrenière M.J. 2012. The impact of permafrost disturbances and sediment loading on the limnological characteristics of two High Arctic lakes. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 23: 119–126.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2018. Technical documentation: Coupled model intercomparison project phase 5 (CMIP5). Available from [accessed February 2018].
Farquarson L.M., Romanovsky V.E., Cable W.L., Walker D.A., Kokelj S.V., and Nicolsky D. 2019. Climate change drives widespread and rapid thermokarst development in very cold permafrost in the Canadian High Arctic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46: 6681–6689.
Fortier D., Allard M., and Shur Y. 2007. Observation of rapid drainage system development by thermal erosion of ice wedges on Bylot Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 18: 229–243.
Fountain A.G., Campbell J.L., Schuur E.A.G., Stammerjohn S.E., Williams M.W., and Ducklow H.W. 2012. The disappearing cryosphere: impacts and ecosystem responses to rapid cryosphere loss. BioScience, 62: 405–415.
Freeze, RA and Cherry, JA. 1979. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall. 604 pp.
Frey K.E. and McClelland J.W. 2009. Impacts of permafrost degradation on arctic river biogeochemistry. Hydrol. Processes, 23: 169–182.
Frey K.E. and Smith L.C. 2005. Amplified carbon release from vast West Siberian peatlands by 2100. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32: L09401.
Fulton, R.J. 1995. Surficial materials of Canada. “A” Series Map 1880A. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Gibson C.M., Chasmer L.E., Thompson D.K., Quinton W.L., Flannigan M.D., and Olefelft D. 2018. Wildfire as a major driver of recent permafrost thaw in boreal peatlands. Nat. Commun. 9: 3041.
Gruber S. 2012. Derivation and analysis of a high-resolution estimate of global permafrost zonation. Cryosphere, 6: 221–233.
Gruber, S., and Haeberli, W. 2009. Mountain permafrost. In Permafrost soils. Soil biology. Edited by R. Margesin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany. Vol. 16, pp. 33–44.
Harris C. and Lewkowicz A.G. 1993. Form and internal structure of active-layer detachment slides, Fosheim Peninsula, Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 30: 1708–1714.
Harris, S.A., French, H.M., Heginbottom, J., Johnston, G.H., Ladanyi, B., Sego, D.C., and van Everdingen, R.O. 1988. Glossary of permafrost and related ground ice terms. National Research Council, Ottawa, Ont., Canada.
Heginbottom, J.A., and Dubreuil, M.A. 1993. A new permafrost and ground ice map for the National Atlas of Canada. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Permafrost, Beijing, China, 5–9 July. Vol. 1, pp. 255–260.
Hinzman L.D., Deal C.J., McGuir A.D., Mernild S.H., Polyakov I.V., and Walsh J.E. 2013. Trajectory of the Arctic as an integrated system. Ecol. Appl. 23: 1837–1868.
Holloway, J.E., Lewkowicz, A.G., Douglas, T.A., Li, X., Turetsky, M.R., Baltzer, J.L., and Jin, H. 2020. Impact of wildfire on permafrost landscapes: a review of recent advances and future prospects. Permafr. Periglac. Process.
Hugelius G., Tarnocai C., Broll G., Canadell J.G., Kuhry P., and Swanson D.K. 2013. The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database: spatially distributed datasets of soil coverage and soil carbon storage in the northern permafrost regions. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5: 3–13.
Huntington H.P., Boyle M., Flowers G.E., Weatherly J.W., Hamilton L.C., Hinzman L.D., et al. 2007. The influence of human activity in the Arctic on climate and climate impacts. Clim. Change, 82: 77–92.
IPCC. 2019. Annex I: glossary [Edited by N.M. Weyer]. In IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. Edited by H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, et al. (in press) Available from
Jones B.M., Grosse G., Arp C., Jones M.C., Anthony K.M.W., and Romanovsky V.E. 2011. Modern thermokarst lake dynamics in the continuous permafrost zone, northern Seward Peninsula, Alaska. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 116: G00M03.
Jorgenson M.T., Shur Y.L., and Pullman E.R. 2006. Abrupt increase in permafrost degradation in Arctic Alaska. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33: L02503.
Jorgenson M.T., Harden J., Kanevskiy M., O’Donnell J., Wikland K., Ewing S., et al.2013. Reorganization of vegetation, hydrology, and soil carbon after permafrost degradation across heterogeneous boreal landscapes. Environ. Res. Lett. 8: 035017.
Jorgenson, M.T., Shur, Y.L., and Osterkamp, T.E. 2008. Thermokarst in Alaska. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Permafrost. Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, 29 June–3 July. Vol. 29, pp. 869–876.
Jorgenson M.T., Romanovsky V., Harden J., Shur Y., O’Donnell J., Schuur E.A.G., and Marchenko S. 2010. Resilience and vulnerability of permafrost to climate change. Can. J. For. Res. 40: 1219–1236.
Karlsson J.M., Lyon S.W., and Destouni G. 2012. Thermokarst lake, hydrological flow and water balance indicators of permafrost change in Western Siberia. J. Hydrol. 464: 459–466.
Koch J.C., Runkel R.L., Striegl R., and McKnight D.M. 2013. Hydrologic controls on the transport and cycling of carbon and nitrogen in a boreal catchment underlain by continuous permafrost. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 118: 698–712.
Kokelj S.V. and Jorgenson M.T. 2013. Advances in thermokarst research. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 24: 108–119.
Kokelj S.V., Lacelle D., Lantz T.C., Tunnicliffe J., Malone L., Clark I.D., and Chin K.S. 2013. Thawing of massive ground ice in mega slumps drives increases in stream sediment and solute flux across a range of watershed scales. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 118: 681–692.
Kokelj S.V., Lantz T.C., Tunnicliffe J., Segal R., and Lacelle D. 2017. Climate-driven thaw of permafrost preserved glacial landscapes, northwestern Canada. Geology, 45(4): 371–374.
Lacelle D., Bjornson J., and Lauriol B. 2010. Climatic and geomorphic factors affecting contemporary (1950–2004) activity of retrogressive thaw slumps on the Aklavik Plateau, Richardson Mountains, NWT, Canada. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 21: 1–15.
Lafrenière M.J. and Lamoureux S.F. 2013. Thermal perturbation and rainfall runoff have greater impact on seasonal solute loads than physical disturbance of the active layer. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 24: 241–251.
Lamontagne-Hallé P., McKenzie J.M., Kurylyk B.L., and Zipper S.C. 2018. Changing groundwater discharge dynamics in permafrost regions. Environ. Res. Lett. 13: 084017.
Lamoureux S.F. and Lafrenière M.J. 2009. Fluvial impact of extensive active layer detachments, Cape Bounty, Melville Island, Canada. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 41: 59–68.
Lantz T.C. and Kokelj S.V. 2008. Increasing rates of retrogressive thaw slump activity in the Mackenzie Delta region, N.W.T., Canada. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35: L06502.
Lantz T.C. and Turner K.W. 2015. Changes in lake areas in response to thermokarst processes and climate in Old Crow Flats, Yukon. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 120: 513–524.
Lawrence D.M. and Swenson S.C. 2011. Permafrost response to increasing Arctic shrub abundance depends on the relative influence of shrubs on local soil cooling versus large-scale climate warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 6: 045504.
Leemans, R., and de Groot, R.S. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. 245 pp.
Lewis T., Braun C., Hardy D.R., Francus P., and Bradley R.S. 2005. An extreme sediment transfer event in a Canadian High Arctic stream. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 37: 477–482.
Lewis T., Lafrenière M.J., and Lamoureux S.F. 2012. Hydrochemical and sedimentary responses of paired High Arctic watersheds to unusual climate and permafrost disturbance, Cape Bounty, Melville Island, Canada. Hydrol. Processes, 26: 2003–2018.
Lewkowicz A.G. 2007. Dynamics of active-layer detachment failures, Fosheim Peninsula, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 18: 89–103.
Lewkowicz A.G. and Harris C. 2005. Frequency and magnitude of active-layer detachment failures in discontinuous and continuous permafrost, northern Canada. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 16: 115–130.
Lewkowicz A.G. and Way R.G. 2019. Extremes of summer climate trigger thousands of thermokarst landslides in a High Arctic environment. Nat. Commun. 10: 1329.
Li Yung Lung J.Y.S., Tank S.E., Spence C., Yang D., Bonsal B., McClelland J.W., and Holmes R.M. 2018. Seasonal and geographic variation in dissolved carbon biogeochemistry of rivers draining to the Canadian Arctic Ocean and Hudson Bay. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 123: 3371–3386.
Liljedahl A.K., Boike J., Daanen R.P., Federov A.N., Frost G.V., Grosse G., et al. 2016. Pan-Arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its influence on tundra hydrology. Nat. Geosci. 9: 312–318.
Liston G.E., McFadden J.P., Sturm M., and Pielke R.A.Sr. 2002. Modelled changes in arctic tundra snow, energy and moisture fluxes due to increased shrubs. Global Change Biol. 8: 17–32.
Lyon S.W. and Destouni G. 2010. Changes in catchment-scale recession flow properties in response to permafrost thawing in the Yukon River Basin. Int. J. Clim. 30: 2138–2145.
MacLean R., Oswood M.W., Irons J.G. III, and McDowell W.H. 1999. The effect of permafrost on stream biogeochemistry: a case study of two streams in the Alaskan (U.S.A.) taiga. Biogeochemistry, 47: 239–267.
Malone L., Lacelle D., Kokelj S.V., and Clark I.D. 2013. Impacts of hillslope thaw slumps on the geochemistry of permafrost catchments (Stony Creek watershed, NWT, Canada). Chem. Geol. 356: 38–49.
Marsh P., Russell M., Pohl S., Haywood H., and Onclin C. 2009. Changes in thaw lake drainage in the Western Canadian Arctic from 1950 to 2000. Hydrol. Processes, 23: 145–158.
McKenzie J.M. and Voss C.I. 2013. Permafrost thaw in a nested groundwater-flow system. Hydrogeol. J. 21: 299–316.
Moquin P.A., Mesquita P.S., Wrona F.J., and Prowse T.D. 2014. Responsesof benthic invertebrate communities to shoreline retrogressive thaw slumps in Arctic upland lakes. Freshw. Sci. 33: 1108–1118.
O’Donnell J.A., Aitken G.R., Walvoord M.A., and Butler K.D. 2012. Dissolved organic matters composition of winter flow in the Yukon River basin: implications of permafrost thaw and increased groundwater discharge. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 26: GB0E06.
Olefeldt D., Goswami S., Grosse G., Hayes D., Hugelius G., Kuhry P., et al. 2016. Circumpolar distribution and carbon storage of thermokarst landscapes. Nat. Commun. 7: 13043.
Oppenheimer, M., Campos, M., Warren, R., Birkmann, J., Luber, G., O’Neill, B., and Takahashi, K. 2014. Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities. In Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by C.B. Field, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, et al. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, N.Y., USA. pp. 1039–1099.
O’Neill H.B., Wolfe S.A., and Duchesne C. 2019. New ground ice maps for Canada using a paleogeographic modelling approach. Cryosphere, 13: 753–773.
Petrone K.C., Jones J.B., Hinzman L.D., and Boone R.D. 2006. Seasonal export of carbon, nitrogen and major solutes from Alaskan catchments with discontinuous permafrost. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 111: G02020.
Pohl S., Marsh P., Onclin C., and Russell M. 2009. The summer hydrology of a small upland tundra thaw lake: implications to lake drainage. Hydrol. Processes, 23: 2536–2546.
Poland J.S., Mitchell S., and Rutter A. 2001. Remediation of former military bases in the Canadian Arctic. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 32: 93–105.
Pollard W.H. and French H.M. 1980. A first approximation of the volume of ground ice, Richards Island, Pleistocene Mackenzie delta, Northwest Territories, Canada. Can. Geotech. J. 17: 509–516.
Quinton W.L., Hayashi M., and Chasmer L.E. 2011. Permafrost-thaw-induced land-cover change in the Canadian subarctic: implications for water resources. Hydrol. Processes, 25: 152–158.
Rawlins M.A., Steele M., Holland M.M., Adam J.C., Cherry J.E., Francis J.A., et al. 2010. Analysis of the Arctic System for freshwater cycle intensification: observations and expectations. J. Clim. 23: 5715–5737.
Raz-Yassef N., Young-Robertson J., Rahn T., Sloan V., Newman B., Wilson C., et al. 2017. Evapotranspiration across plant types and geomorphological units in polygonal Arctic tundra. J. Hydrol. 553: 816–825.
Rinke A., Matthes H., Christensen J.H., Kuhry P., Romanovsky V.E., and Dethloff K. 2012. Arctic RCM simulations of temperature and precipitation derived indices relevant to future frozen ground conditions. Global Planet. Change, 80: 136–148.
Sannel A.B.K. and Kuhry P. 2011. Warming-induced destabilization of peat plateau/thermokarst lake complexes. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 116: G03035.
Smith L.C., Sheng Y., MacDonald G.M., and Hinzman L.D. 2005. Disappearing Arctic lakes. Science, 308: 1429.
Smith L.C., Pavelsky T.M., MacDonald G.M., Shiklomaniv A.I., and Lammers R.B. 2007. Rising minimum daily flows in northern Eurasian rivers: a growing influence of groundwater in the high-latitude hydrologic cycle. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 112: G04S47.
Smith, S.L., and Burgess, M.M. 1999. Mapping the response of Canadian permafrost to climate warming. In Interactions between the cryosphere. Edited by M. Tranter, R. Armstrong, E. Brun, G. Jones, M. Sharp, and M. Williams. Climate and Greenhouse Gases (Proceedings of IUGG 99 Sympsium HS2, Birmingham, UK, July 1999). IAHS Publication #256, Wallingford, UK, pp. 71–80.
Smith S.L. and Riseborough D.W. 2010. Modelling the thermal response of permafrost terrain to right-of-way disturbance and climate warming. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 60: 92–103.
Smith, S.L., Burgess, M.M., and Riseborough, D.W. 2008. Ground temperature and thaw settlement in frozen peatlands along the Norman Wells pipeline corridor, NWT Canada: 22 years of monitoring. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Permafrost. Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, 19 June–3 July. Vol. 2, pp. 1665–1670.
Smith S.L., Throop J., and Lewkowicz A.G. 2012. Recent changes in climate and permafrost temperatures at forested and polar desert sites in northern Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 49: 914–924.
St. Jacques J.M. and Sauchyn D.J. 2009. Increasing winter baseflow and mean annual streamflow from possible permafrost thawing in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36: L01401.
Stieglitz M., Déry S.J., Romanovsky V.E., and Osterkamp T.E. 2003. The role of snow cover in the warming of arctic permafrost. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30: 1721.
Strauss J., Schirrmeister L., Grosse G., Fortier D., Hugelius G., Knoblauch C., et al. 2017. Deep Yedoma permafrost: a synthesis of depositional characteristics and carbon vulnerability. Earth-Sci. Rev. 172: 75–86.
Striegl R.G., Aiken G.R., Dornblaser M.M., Raymond P.A., and Wickland K.P. 2005. A decrease in discharge-normalized DOC export by the Yukon River during summer through autumn. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32: L21413.
Tarnocai, C., and Lacelle, B. 1996. Soil organic carbon of Canada map. Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Ottawa, Ont., Canada.
Thomas D.J., Tracey B., Marshall H., and Norstrom R.J. 1992. Arctic terrestrial ecosystem contamination. Sci. Total Environ. 122: 135–164.
Turetsky M.R., Abbott B.W., Jones M.C., Anthony K.W., Olefeldt D., Schuur E.A.G., et al. 2019. Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release. Nature, 569: 32–34.
USDA-NRCS. 2012. Assessment of the effects of conservation practices on cultivated cropland in the upper Missouri River Basin. Department of Agriculture, USA. 227 pp.
Van Wagner, C.E. 1987. Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Forestry Technical Report No. 35. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, Ont., Canada.
Walvoord M.A. and Kurylyk B.L. 2016. Hydrologic impacts of thawing permafrost — a review. Vadose Zone J. 15: 1–20.
Walvoord M.A. and Striegl R.G. 2007. Increased groundwater to stream discharge from permafrost thawing in the Yukon River basin: potential impacts on lateral export of carbon and nitrogen. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34: L12402.
Walvoord M.A, Voss C.I., and Wellman T.P. 2012. Influence of permafrost distribution on groundwater flow in the context of climate-driven permafrost thaw: example from Yukon Flats Basin, Alaska, United States. Water Resour. Res. 48: W07524.
Wheeler, J.O., Huffman, P.F., Card, K.D., Davidson, A., Sandford, B.V., Okulitch, A.V., and Roest W.R. 1997. Geological Map of Canada, Geological Survey of Canada Map D1860A, Ottawa.
White D., Hinzman L.D., Alessa L., Cassano J., Chambers M., Falkner K., et al. 2007. The arctic freshwater system: changes and impacts. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 112: G04S54.
Williams T.J., Quinton W.L., and Baltzer J.L. 2013. Linear disturbances on discontinuous permafrost: implications for thaw-induced changes to land cover and drainage patterns. Environ. Res. Lett. 8: 025006.
Wolfe, S.A., Gills, A., and Robertson, L. 2009. Late Quaternary eolian deposits of northern North America: age and extent. Geological Survey of Canada. Open File 6006. Ottawa, ON.
Wolfe, S.A., Morse, P.D., Hoeve, T.E., Sladen, W.E., Kokelj, S.V., and Arenson, L.U. 2015. Disequilibrium permafrost conditions on NWT Highway 3. In Proceedings GeoQuébec 2015, Québec, QC. September 20–23.
Wright N., Hayashi M., and Quinton W.L. 2009. Spatial and temporal variations in active layer thawing and their implication on runoff generation in peat-covered permafrost terrain. Water Resour. Res. 45: W05414.
Yoshikawa K. and Hinzman L.D. 2003. Shrinking thermokarst ponds and groundwater dynamics in discontinuous permafrost near Council, Alaska. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 14: 151–160.
Yoshikawa K., Bolton W.R., Romanovsky V.E., Fukuda M., and Hinzman L.D. 2002. Impacts of wildfire on the permafrost in the boreal forests of Interior Alaska. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 107(D1): FFR 4-1–FFR 4-14.
Zhang Y., Chen W., and Riseborough D.W. 2008. Transient projections of permafrost distribution in Canada during the 21st century under scenarios of climate change. Global Planet. Change, 60: 443–456.
Zhang Y., Wolfe S.A., Morse P.D., Olthof I., and Fraser R.H. 2015. Spatiotemporal impacts of wildfire and climate warming on permafrost across a subarctic region, Canada. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 120: 2338–2356.

Supplementary Material

File (as-2019-0028suppla.docx)

Information & Authors


Published In

cover image Arctic Science
Arctic Science
Volume 6Number 4December 2020
Pages: 437 - 462


Received: 5 December 2019
Accepted: 6 May 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 20 May 2020
Version of record online: 20 May 2020

Key Words

  1. permafrost thaw
  2. water resources
  3. climate
  4. thermokarst


  1. dégel du pergélisol
  2. ressources en eau
  3. climat
  4. thermokarst



Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 3H5, Canada.
M. Norris
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
G. Bickerton
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, ON L7S 1A1, Canada.
B.R. Bonsal
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 3H5, Canada.
R. Brua
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 3H5, Canada.
J.M. Culp
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, ON L7S 1A1, Canada.
Y. Dibike
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
S. Gruber
Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
P.D. Morse
Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8, Canada.
D.L. Peters
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
R. Shrestha
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
S.A. Wolfe
Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8, Canada.


Copyright remains with the author(s) or their institution(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Metrics & Citations


Other Metrics


Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security
2. Vulnerability assessment of peatland complexes in the Hudson Plains (Ontario, Canada) to permafrost‐thaw‐induced landcover and hydrological change using a multiscale approach
3. Towards the incorporation of hydrogeochemistry into the modelling of permafrost environments: a review of recent recommendations, considerations, and literature
4. The Northwest Territories Thermokarst Mapping Collective: A northern-driven mapping collaborative toward understanding the effects of permafrost thaw
5. The Northwest Territories Thermokarst Mapping Collective: a northern-driven mapping collaborative toward understanding the effects of permafrost thaw
6. Landscape influence on permafrost ground ice geochemistry in a polar desert environment, Resolute Bay, Nunavut
7. Estimation of groundwater contributions to Athabasca River, Alberta, Canada
8. Limnology and diatom ecology of shallow lakes in a rapidly thawing discontinuous permafrost peatland
9. Mackenzie River Basin
10. Element transport in the Taz River, western Siberia
11. Permafrost thaw sensitivity prediction using surficial geology, topography, and remote-sensing imagery: a data-driven neural network approach
12. Landscape influence on permafrost ground ice geochemistry in a polar desert environment, Resolute Bay, Nunavut
13. Paleolimnological perspectives on the shifting geographic template of permafrost landscapes and its implications for Arctic freshwater biodiversity
14. Sensitivity of headwater streamflow to thawing permafrost and vegetation change in a warming Arctic
15. Carbon dissolution effects on pH changes of RAMP lakes in northeastern Alberta, Canada
16. High Latitude Rivers: Ecosystems Shaped by Environmental Extremes

View Options

View options


View PDF

Get Access





Share Options


Share the article link

Share on social media