Cookies Notification

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.
×

Development of a speargun projectile penetrometer in soil

Publication: Canadian Geotechnical Journal
20 August 2024

Abstract

This study investigates the applicability of a speargun projectile penetrometer (SPP) for offshore site investigation purposes using experimental testing. The SPP can shoot penetrometers using an elastic/pneumatic force. The speargun is easy to handle, can generate significant kinetic energy, and requires a single operator to perform the test. A laboratory test platform was utilised to hold the SPP and ensure vertical launch, while a laser displacement sensor was employed to monitor the penetration depth and record the corresponding time history. The result demonstrated that the speargun-launched method achieves significantly higher embedment depth compared to an equivalent free-falling penetrometer. In particular, the new method produces sufficiently deep penetration in dense sand, thus overcoming the typical penetrometer tilting issue caused by shallow penetration. These findings provide a preliminary insight into the SPP, allowing for exploration beyond the boundaries of traditional penetrometers in laboratory testing and offshore site investigation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Chow S.H., Airey D.W. 2013. Soil strength characterisation using free-falling penetrometers. Géotechnique, 63(13): 1131–1143.
Chow S.H., O'Loughlin C.D., Goh C.L.V., McIlduff R., White D.J., Chow F.C. 2023. A comparative field study of free-fall cone and sphere penetrometers in soft sediment. Ocean Engineering, 280: 114094.
Hariprasad C., Rajashekhar M., Umashankar B. 2016. Preparation of uniform sand specimens using stationary pluviation and vibratory methods. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 34: 1909–1922.
O'Loughlin C.D., Richardson M.D., Randolph M.F., Gaudin C. 2013. Penetration of dynamically installed anchors in clay. Géotechnique, 63(11): 909–919.
Rong J., Nazem M., Chow S.H., Zhou A., Moridpour S. 2024. Design and application of dynamic seabed penetrators in offshore geotechnical engineering: a review. Ocean Engineering, 293: 116599.
Stark N., Hanff H., Kopf A.J. 2009. Nimrod: a tool for rapid geotechnical characterisation of surface sediments. Sea Technology, 50(4): 10–14.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1 (DOCX / 34.6 KB).
Supplementary Material 2 (MP4 / 22.7 MB).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Volume 61Number 11November 2024
Pages: 2588 - 2592

History

Received: 18 January 2024
Accepted: 30 May 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 5 June 2024
Version of record online: 20 August 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. dynamic penetrometer
  2. speargun projectile
  3. offshore geotechnical engineering
  4. sand

Authors

Affiliations

School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, Australia
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, and Writing – original draft.
School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, Australia
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review & editing.
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Author Contributions: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, and Writing – review & editing.
School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, Australia
Author Contributions: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, and Writing – review & editing.
Annan Zhou served as Editorial Board Member at the time of manuscript review and acceptance and did not handle peer review and editorial decisions regarding this manuscript.
School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Melbourne, Australia
Author Contributions: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review & editing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: JR, MN
Data curation: JR, MN, SHC
Formal analysis: JR, SHC, AZ
Funding acquisition: MN, AZ, SM
Investigation: JR, MN, SHC, SM
Methodology: JR, MN, SHC
Project administration: JR, MN, SHC, AZ, SM
Resources: JR, MN, AZ, SM
Supervision: JR, MN, AZ, SM
Validation: JR, MN, SHC, AZ, SM
Visualization: JR, SHC, AZ
Writing – original draft: JR
Writing – review & editing: MN, SHC, AZ, SM

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Geotechnical Journal

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media