Introduction
Pork is an important source of animal protein. Growth traits are among the most important economic characteristics that attract the attention of pig breeders. Muscle growth is influenced by a series of genes and factors regulated via complex pathways, such as temporal and spatial expression, signal cascades, transcriptional regulation, and feedback mechanisms (
Hettmer and Wagers 2010).
The growth and development of mammalian skeletal muscles are divided into two stages, namely pre- and post-birth. During the pre-birth stage, myoblasts proliferate and coalesce to form myotubes, which in turn fuse to form muscle fibers, while in the post-birth stage, muscle fibers do not increase in number, mainly due to hypertrophy of muscle fibers and transformation of muscle fiber types (
Rahman et al. 2014), and the growth and regeneration of skeletal muscles mainly depend on muscle satellite cells. Under normal circumstances, muscle satellite cells are in static and dormant states. When subjected to physical stimulation or muscle damage, muscle satellite cells participate in the damage repair process (
Wagers and Conboy 2005). Studies have shown that the activation of muscle satellite cells can promote muscle growth. Following activation, muscle satellite cells exit the static state, proliferate, and differentiate into myoblasts, which further differentiate and fuse into multinucleated myotubes (
Feige et al. 2018).
With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technology, several transcription factors affecting pig muscle growth have been identified. For example,
TNF-α plays an important role in muscle repair and myogenesis, while
NF-κB is an important transcription factor involved in skeletal muscle atrophy caused by various catabolic stimuli, including
TNF-α (
Dogra et al. 2007). When differentiating into muscle cells,
TNF-α-induced
NF-κB activation decreases the expression of myogenic proteins and myosin heavy chains. In differentiated myotubes, transfected mutant I-κBa induces
NF-κB activation and decreases the levels of total protein and rapid myosin heavy chains (
Li and Reid 2000).
Shang et al. (2019) sequenced the transcriptome and proteome of the embryonic muscle tissues of Tibetan, Wujin, and large white pigs and found that 20 genes, including
CRYAB, FSCN1, and
MAPK12, which are associated with myoblast differentiation and muscle fiber formation, may play an important role in determining the postnatal growth rate and theoretical weight of pigs.
Xu et al. (2019) compared the 90 kg Min pig with the Changbai Mountain wild boar and identified 4522 differential genes enriched in the development, differentiation, and growth of muscle fibers in pig skeletal muscle.
Zhang et al. (2019) sequenced the longissimus dorsi muscle (LD) muscle of Landrace and Wuzhishan miniature pigs at 18, 21, and 28 days after birth via whole genome bisulfite sequencing.
Tet1 is involved in the demethylation of the myogenin promoter and promotes the immortalization of the mouse myoblast cell line C2C12 and the differentiation of porcine embryonic myoblasts. Meanwhile,
Zhao et al. (2015) compared the LD muscle of Tongcheng and Yorkshire pigs from 30 days to 5 weeks after birth and found that
CXCL10, EIF2B5, PSMA6, FBXO32, and
Loc100622249 play an important role in the muscle regulatory network of Tongcheng pigs, while
SGCD, ENG, THBD, AQP4, and
BTG2 play a major role in large white pigs, showing various specific and development-dependent differential expression patterns.
However, the genetic mechanisms underlying muscle growth, which is a complex trait involving multi-gene expression, are not fully understood. Developing transcriptomic and proteomic profiles allows for the identification of genes involved in the regulation of muscle growth at the mRNA and protein levels. RNA-Seq provides a more precise measurement of transcript levels and isoforms compared with alternative approaches; proteomics can also quantify protein levels accurately (
Wang et al. 2017;
Zhang et al. 2017). The main links of gene expression include transcription and protein synthesis. mRNA is an intermediate of gene expression, determining the identity of the expressed gene and its transcription level (
Costa et al. 2010), and protein is a direct functional executor (
Berry 2004). Joint analysis of two omics can achieve complementarity between the two, providing comprehensive analysis of mRNA and protein expression levels in specific states of organisms. In addition, we can obtain an in-depth analysis of differential expression, dig out differential genes or differential proteins regulated by post-transcription, find and verify some important regulatory pathways. Both RNA-seq and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) have been widely used to screen functional genes involved in muscle growth and lipid deposition in pigs and other domestic species (
Wang et al. 2013;
Wang et al. 2016). Integrating transcriptome and proteome analyses provides insights into the key functional genes and their regulatory mechanisms underlying muscle growth in TPs.
TPs are a unique plateau pig breed capable of adapting to the cold and low-oxygen conditions at high altitudes and containing high fat deposition and good meat quality. The current research on TPs mainly focuses on their origin and domestication (
Yang et al. 2011), genetic diversity (
Xiang-Yun et al. 2000;
Ge et al. 2020), hypoxia adaptation (
Jia et al. 2016;
Wu et al. 2019), meat quality (
Gan et al. 2019), reproductive performance, and microbiota (
Yang et al. 2021). Relatively little research has been conducted on the mechanisms underlying muscle growth and development in TPs, and the analysis of transcriptional regulation of muscle growth and development in TPs is limited and needs to be explored. The DP is a typical lean-type modern breed with a higher growth rate, lean meat percentage, and high food conversion efficiency (
Pan et al. 2003), whereas TPs have slow growth and low fecundity. These differences may be caused by gene expression in muscle tissue. Therefore, comparing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the LD muscle tissue of TPs and DPs can be used to understand the molecular basis of pig muscle growth and development.
In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of LD muscle tissues obtained from TPs and DPs, using RNA-seq and iTRAQ technologies to better understand muscle growth and developmental regulation in pigs and other agricultural animals, and provide a reference for genetic improvement in TPs.
Discussion
Local Chinese pig breeds have good meat quality but slow growth. TPs are a unique plateau pig breed with good meat quality and high fat deposition. Muscle growth is controlled by a series of genes or factors that are regulated in a complex manner (
Hettmer and Wagers 2010). In the current study, we screened for key genes and proteins associated with muscle growth by comparing TPs and DPs raised under the same feeding conditions using RNA-seq and iTRAQ protein sequencing analyses. Subsequent functional enrichment analysis of each DEG and DAP identified via these analyses using GO and KEGG analysis identified 10 DEGs (
PPARG, FASN, SCD, ACTA2, PCK1, ENG, PLIN1, SOX9, GATA2, and
ACSS1) and 7 DAPs (
TXN, SNU13, PRDX5, SOD1, RPL28, RPS6, and
TNXL4A) that appear to be associated with muscle growth in the large Diqing Tibetan pig.
APOA1, IGFN1, ALDH2, and
ATP8 were identified as both DEGs and DAPs.
The genesis of skeletal muscle is divided into three stages: the formation and proliferation of myoblasts, the fusion of myoblasts to form myotubes, and the formation of muscle fibers. The growth and regeneration of skeletal muscle after birth mainly depend on muscle satellite cells, which participate in the repair of skeletal muscle injuries.
In this study, we identified a pair of DEG and DAP (
FASN and
TXN) associated with myoblast proliferation, among which
FASN preferentially produces palmitic acid (16:0) and, to a lesser extent, stearic acid (18:0) (
Balgoma et al. 2019). These fatty acids are utilized for de novo synthesis of phosphatidic acid (PA) for cell proliferation, followed by conversion to diacylglycerol (DG) by PA phosphohydrolase and cytidinediphosphate-diacylglycerol (CDP-DG) by CDP-DG synthetase to yield phospholipids and triacylglycerols. Diacylglycerol kinase η (DGKη) is highly expressed in C2C12 myoblasts and regulates myoblast proliferation. C30−C36-PA species generated by DGKη control
FASN expression through the mTOR signaling pathway to regulate myoblast proliferation.
FASN catalyzes the de novo synthesis of fatty acids for myoblast proliferation (
Sakai et al. 2020;
Solsona et al. 2021). In addition,
FASN showed the strongest correlation with intramuscular fat (IMF) content (
Wang et al. 2020a), and
FASN is a lipogenic gene known to influence fat deposition and fatty acid metabolism in meat and adipose tissues (
Otto et al. 2022). It is a multifunctional enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA to palmitate, and the
FASN gene has been mapped to BTA19. Of particular interest was the SNP g.17924A > G polymorphism, which causes the replacement of the threonine to alanine, which affects the fat content in carcasses and the proportion of FA and SFA/MUFA/PUFA in beef meat (
Pećina et al. 2023).
TXN is a growth factor secreted by virus-transformed leukemic cell lines and exerts its effects on cell growth and proliferation via its reducing activity. Several studies have revealed that the thioredoxin-interacting protein (
TXNIP) binds to
TXN and inhibits its function (
Yamanaka et al. 2000). In addition, growth control and transcription factor modulation by
TXN may be regulated by
TXNIP as part of a nuclear transcriptional coactivation complex in the nucleus, while
TXNIP, a negative regulator of
TXN, may regulate diverse cellular processes, including growth signaling.
TRX is the major component of the TXN system. Several independent reports revealed that
TXNIP binds to reduced
TRX to form a stable disulfide-linked complex that decreases TRX-reducing activity and inhibits the interaction of
TRX with other proteins, indicating that
TXNIP acts as an endogenous inhibitor of
TRX.
Yu et al. (2007) found that both
TXNIP and
TRX played a crucial role in the redox-mediated control of cell proliferation and growth traits in a large number of pig samples. Furthermore, the increased expression of
TXNIP and decreased expression of
TRX might lead to atrophy in rats (
Matsushima et al. 2006).
FASN and
TXN were upregulated in our study, which may have promoted myoblast proliferation and led to skeletal muscle hypertrophy.
In addition,
APOA1 is involved in cholesterol transport and lipid metabolism. Further,
APOA1 has been shown to play an important role in the early stages of muscle development in Thai indigenous chickens.
Picard et al. (2010) observed a high abundance of
APOA1 during the early stages of myogenesis and a decrease during the later stages in both bovine and chicken muscles. This progressive decrease was confirmed using Western blotting and immunohistochemical analyses of bovine muscle. However, its expression in muscle fibers has not been previously described. Our study suggests that
APOA1 is involved in muscle development and growth and plays a role in the early stages of muscle growth and development.
During skeletal myogenesis, mononuclear myoblasts fuse to form primary myotubes, which further differentiate under the control of motor neurons, and the number of myofibrils in the cells continues to increase. Simultaneously, the nucleus gradually moves from the center of the cell to the edge of the cell, completing the maturation process of myotubes (muscle fibers). A set of DEGs and DAPs (
ACTA2, SNU13, IGFN1, and
SOX9) were involved in these processes. Of these,
ACTA2, one of the six actin subtypes and a marker of myofibroblast formation, is a reliable marker protein of the myofibroblast phenotype. The process of transformation of stellate cells into myofibroblasts, also known as “activation”—in which
ACTA2 is an integral component—appears to be analogous to the process occurring in fibroblasts after injury and wound healing in pathological settings (
Barnes and Gorin 2011). Myofibroblasts, which share the unique property of expressing
ACTA2 during wound repair, appear to be central to this process.
SNU13 is an RNA-binding protein that binds noncoding RNAs associated with the spliceosome and regulates myogenesis in vertebrates (
Johnson et al. 2013). Morpholino knockdown experiments in zebrafish indicated that
SNU13 is a conserved essential regulator of myogenesis, which disrupts skeletal muscle development.
SNU13 causes myotube elongation and significantly restores MHC expression in somatic muscle tissue during myogenesis.
IGFN1 is a large skeletal muscle protein localized to both the z-disc and the nucleus. The domain composition of
IGFN1 consists of immunoglobulin and fibronectin-like domains, similar to those of sarcomeric proteins involved in maintaining the structural integrity of the muscle fiber. Evidence has implicated
IGFN1 in both atrophies and myoblast fusion (
Li et al. 2017).
IGFN1 expression is positively correlated with atrophic conditions and myostatin signaling, a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass (
Rahimov et al. 2011). When myostatin signaling is increased via injection of adenoviral vectors in mice, muscle mass decreases, while
IGFN1 mRNA expression increases (
Chen et al. 2014). Knockdown of
IGFN1 in C2C12 cells has previously been shown to decrease myoblast fusion and aberrant cell morphology (
Li et al. 2017). Therefore, the upregulation of
SNU13 in our study may indicate skeletal muscle development, while the downregulation of
IGFN1, which inhibits myostatin, may indicate an increase in muscle mass.
SOX9 is necessary for chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage development.
Schmidt et al. (2003) found that in the process of adult skeletal muscle myogenic differentiation, the downregulation of
SOX8 and
SOX9 in satellite cells occurs at the same time. In contrast, the overexpression of
SOX9 attenuates the ability of myoblasts to form myotubes. At the same time, the expression of
MyoD and
MyoG is reduced, as the
MyoG activity induced by
MyoD is strongly reduced by
SOX8. SOX8 and
SOX9 are specific negative regulators of myoprotein expression. This may be responsible for maintaining the undifferentiated state of myoblasts and preventing premature differentiation into myotubes. Co-transfection of
SOX9 with
MyoD prevented the emergence of myogenin, supporting the role of
SOX9 in preventing myocyte differentiation.
The repair of skeletal muscle injury and the transformation of muscle fiber types promote skeletal muscle development. In this study, two DEGs (
PCK1 and
PPARG) were associated with these processes and highly expressed in TPs. When
PCK1 was specifically overexpressed in skeletal muscle by generating transgenic mice, an enhanced exercise capacity relative to the control was observed, while their muscles had higher mitochondrial numbers as well as elevated triglyceride content. This indicated a re-patterning of energy metabolism toward a more oxidative metabolism, with increased use of fats as a substrate. Muscles from muscle-specific
PCK1 transgenic mice had increased mitochondrial density and high succinate dehydrogenase enzyme activities (
Hakimi et al. 2007), which suggests that their muscle fibers had become oxidative-type fibers.
Varga et al. (2016) found that macrophage
PPARG is a metabolic sensor and regulator of skeletal muscle regeneration, and in macrophages, it modulates an unknown signaling system that could influence myoblast proliferation in a paracrine manner.
GDF3, a direct
PPARG target, is a regulator of myoblast proliferation, differentiation, and muscle regeneration (
Patsalos et al. 2018). The PPARG–GDF3 regulator
y axis identifies a sensory-regulatory-effector mechanism by which macrophages regulate the tissue progenitor compartment, namely myogenic precursor cells. This axis orchestrates tissue regeneration, possibly in unison with other members of the
TGF-β family, leading to synchronous regeneration (
Hakimi et al. 2007). During skeletal muscle regeneration,
PPARG is strongly upregulated 3 days post-injury (
Lukjanenko et al. 2013) when fibro/adipogenic progenitors expand to support myogenesis.
PPARG deletion in skeletal muscle induces insulin resistance and decreases carbohydrate oxidation and glucose uptake. In this study, PPARG and PCK1 were upregulated, which suggests that energy metabolism had probably transformed into oxidative metabolism and that muscle fiber hypertrophy during skeletal muscle regeneration had occurred.
We identified a set of associated DEGs (
PPARG, FASN, SCD, PCK1, and
PLIN1) with the PPAR, AMPK, and insulin signaling pathways. The PPAR signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of lipid and energy metabolism, inflammation, and diabetes. Its physiological functions mainly involve fatty acid metabolism, glucose metabolism, cell proliferation, and differentiation (
Chinetti et al. 2000). And
PPARG was the core regulator gene of the PPAR signaling pathway.
PPARG regulates lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis and promotes adipocyte differentiation and fat deposition (
Wang et al. 2013). The AMPK signaling pathway can restore intracellular energy homeostasis by inhibiting the biosynthetic process of ATP consumption, including gluconeogenesis, lipid and protein synthesis, and the activation of metabolic-related pathways (
Xiao et al. 2007). Following
PPARG activation,
AMPK is activated by increased adiponectin expression. During adiponectin resistance, the stimulatory effect of adiponectin on
AMPK is weakened, and consequently, the effect of fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscles is also weakened. This promotes insulin resistance, which affects the absorption and utilization of glucose in muscle tissue and the sensitivity of adipose tissue to insulin (
Wang et al. 2020b), regulating energy metabolism.
According to GO and KEGG pathway analyses, few of the identified DEGs and DAPs (
ALDH2, ATP8, SOD1, and
ACSS1) were primarily involved in energy metabolism pathways, such as the metabolic pathway, which participate in lipid metabolism, energy regulation, and other processes (
Shi et al. 2013) and affect the absorption and utilization of glucose in muscle tissue and the sensitivity of adipose tissue to insulin (
Wang et al. 2020b). When the sensitivity of insulin is reduced, the efficiency of glucose uptake and utilization is reduced, excessive energy intake occurs and muscle fibers become thicker (
Chien et al. 2020), lipolysis is reduced (
Kim et al. 2017), and lipid deposition is increased (
Banerjee et al. 2010).