Cookies Notification

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.
×

Linking ecosystem processes to consumer growth rates: gross primary productivity as a driver of freshwater fish somatic growth in a resource-limited river

Publication: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
28 June 2023

Abstract

Individual growth can exert strong control on population dynamics but is constrained by resource acquisition rates. Difficulty in accurately quantifying resource availability over large spatial extents and at high temporal frequencies often limits attempts to understand the extent to which resources limit individual growth. Daily estimates of stream metabolism, including gross primary productivity (GPP), are increasingly available but have not, to our knowledge, been linked to fish growth. Here we examine how environmental variables such as GPP, water temperature, turbidity, and high-flow releases from a dam are linked to spatiotemporal variation in the growth of flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis) in the Colorado River within the Grand Canyon. We fit state-space growth models to 6 years of mark–recapture data collected in four river reaches spanning 300 river kilometers. Consistent with past research in this system, we find that all four environmental variables influence growth in length of a native primary consumer fish. GPP and temperature have a positive influence on growth, while turbidity and high-flow events have a negative influence. Water temperature is the dominant driver of spatiotemporal variation in growth, while the link between high-frequency GPP and fish growth is relatively novel. Fish growth is likely to be linked to stream metabolism in other systems where overall productivity, not the quality of primary producers, limits the food webs that support fish growth.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Appling A.P., Hall R.O., Yackulic C.B., Arroita M. 2018a. Overcoming equifinality: leveraging long time series for stream metabolism estimation. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 123: 624–645.
Appling A.P., Read J.S., Winslow L.A., Arroita M., Bernhardt E.S., Griffiths N.A., et al. 2018b. The metabolic regimes of 356 rivers in the United States. Sci. Data, 5: 180292.
Bair L.S., Yackulic C.B., Schmidt J.C., Perry D.M., Kirchhoff C.J., Chief K., Colombi B.J. 2019. Incorporating social-ecological considerations into basin-wide responses to climate change in the Colorado River Basin. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 37: 14–19.
Behn K.E., Baxter C.V. 2019. The trophic ecology of a desert river fish assemblage: influence of season and hydrologic variability. Ecosphere, 10: e02583.
Bernhardt E.S., Savoy P., Vlah M.J., Appling A.P., Koenig L.E., Hall R.O., et al. 2022. Light and flow regimes regulate the metabolism of rivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119: e2121976119.
Bruckerhoff L.A., Wheeler K., Dibble K.L., Mihalevich B.A., Neilson B.T., Wang J., et al. 2022. Water storage decisions and consumptive use may constrain ecosystem management under severe sustained drought. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1752–1688.13020.
Bunch A.J., Walters C.J., Coggins L.G. 2013. Measurement error in fish lengths: evaluation and management implications. Fisheries, 38: 320–326.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2004. Lower Colorado river multi-species conservation program: final habitat conservation plan. Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program, Sacramento, CA.
Cargnelli L.M., Gross M.R. 1996. The temporal dimension in fish recruitment: birth date, body size, and size-dependent survival in a sunfish (bluegill: Lepomis macrochirus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 360–367.
Chapman K.A., Best R.J., Smith M.E., Mueller E.R., Grams P.E., Parnell R.A. 2021. Estimating the contribution of tributary sand inputs to controlled flood deposits for sandbar restoration using elemental tracers, Colorado River, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. GSA Bull. 133: 1141–1156.
Chart T.E., Bergersen E.P. 1992. Impact of mainstream impoundment on the distribution and movements of the resident flannelmouth sucker (Catostomidae: Catostomus latipinnis) population in the White River, Colorado. Southwest. Nat. 37: 9.
Compton R.I., Hubert W.A., Rahel F.J., Quist M.C., Bower M.R. 2008. Influences of fragmentation on three species of native warmwater fishes in a Colorado River Basin Headwater Stream System, Wyoming. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 28: 1733–1743.
Cross W.F., Baxter C.V., Donner K.C., Rosi-Marshall E.J., Kennedy T.A., Hall R.O., et al. 2011. Ecosystem ecology meets adaptive management: food web response to a controlled flood on the Colorado River, Glen Canyon. Ecol. Appl. 21: 2016–2033.
Cross W.F., Baxter C.V., Rosi-Marshall E.J., Hall R.O., Kennedy T.A., Donner K.C., et al. 2013. Food-web dynamics in a large river discontinuum. Ecol. Monogr. 83: 311–337.
Deemer B.R., Yard M.D., Voichick N., Goodenough D., Bennett G.E., Hall R.O., et al. 2022a. Gross primary production estimates and associated light, sediment, and water quality data from the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam. U.S. Geological Survey Data Release.
Deemer B.R., Yackulic C.B., Hall R.O., Dodrill M.J., Kennedy T.A., Muehlbauer J.D., et al. 2022b. Experimental flows that reduced hydropeaking increased gross primary productivity for 425 kilometers downstream. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1–12.
Department of Interior (DOI). 2016. Glen Canyon Dam long-term experimental and management plan final environmental impact statement (LTEMP FEIS). U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region, National Park Service, Intermountain Region.
Dibble K.L., Yackulic C.B., Kennedy T.A., Bestgen K.R., Schmidt J.C. 2021. Water storage decisions will determine the distribution and persistence of imperiled river fishes. Ecol. Appl. 31: e02279.
Dzul M.C., Yackulic C.B., Korman J., Yard M.D., Muehlbauer J.D. 2017. Incorporating temporal heterogeneity in environmental conditions into a somatic growth model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 74: 316–326.
Dzul M.C., Yackulic C.B., Stone D.M., Van Haverbeke D.R. 2016. Survival, growth, and movement of Subadult Humpback Chub, Gila Cypha, in the Little Colorado River, Arizona: variation in vital rates of a native fish in a desert stream. River Res. Appl. 32: 373–382.
Fernández-Tizón M., Emmenegger T., Perner J. 2020. Arthropod biomass increase in spring correlates with NDVI in grassland habitat. Sci. Nat. 107.
Finch C., Pine W.E., III, Limburg K.E. 2015. Do hydropeaking flows alter juvenile fish growth rates? A test with juvenile humpback chub in the Colorado River. River Res. Appl. 31: 156–164.
Fraser G.S., Winkelman D.L., Bestgen K.R., Thompson K.G. 2017. Tributary use by imperiled flannelmouth and bluehead suckers in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 146: 858–870.
Friedland K.D., Stock C., Drinkwater K.F., Link J.S., Leaf R.T., Shank B.V., et al. 2012. Pathways between primary production and fisheries yields of large marine ecosystems. PLoS One, 7: e28945.
Genzoli L., Hall R.O. 2016. Shifts in Klamath River metabolism following a reservoir cyanobacterial bloom. Freshw. Sci. 35.
Gerwing T.G., Plate E. 2018. Effectiveness of nutrient enhancement as a remediation or compensation strategy of salmonid fisheries in culturally oligotrophic lakes and streams in temperate climates. Restor. Ecol. 27: 279–288.
Gilbert E.I., Brandenburg W.H., Barkalow A.L., Kegerries R.B., Albrecht B.C., Healy B.D., et al. 2022. Systematic larval fish surveys and abiotic correlates characterize extant native fish assemblage reprudictive success in the Colorado River, Western Grand Canyon, Arizona. Southwest. Nat. 66.
Hall R.O., Ulseth A.J. 2020. Gas exchange in streams and rivers. WIREs Water, 7.
Hall R.O., Yackulic C.B., Kennedy T.A., Yard M.D., Rosi-Marshall E.J., Voichick N., Behn K.E. 2015. Turbidity, light, temperature, and hydropeaking control primary productivity in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon: semimechanistic modeling of daily GPP. Limnol. Oceanogr. 60: 512–526.
Hansen L.E. and Yackulic, C.B. 2023. Mark-recapture and environmental data used to predict flannelmouth sucker (Catostomous latippinis) growth rates within the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon from April 2012 to October 2018. U.S. Geological Survey data release.
Hooten M.B., Hobbs N.T. 2015. A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists. Ecol. Monogr. 85: 3–28.
Hosen J.D., Aho K.S., Appling A.P., Creech E.C., Fair J.H., Hall R.O., et al. 2019. Enhancement of primary production during drought in a temperate watershed is greater in larger rivers than headwater streams. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64: 1458–1472.
Huey R.B., Stevenson R.D. 1979. Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: a discussion of approaches. Am. Zool. 19: 357–366.
Ishwaran H., Rao J.S. 2005. Spike and slab variable selection: frequentist and Bayesian strategies. Ann. Stat. 33: 730–773.
Korman J., Deemer B.R., Yackulic C.B., Kennedy T.A., Giardina M. 2023. Drought-related changes in water quality surpass effects of experimental flows on trout growth downstream of Lake Powell reservoir. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 80: 424–438.
Korman J., Yard M.D., Dzul M., Yackulic C.B., Dodrill M.J., Deemer B.R., Kennedy T.A. 2021. The anatomy of a population collapse: effects of prey availability, turbidity-driven feeding efficiency, and competition on the growth and abundance of a fish population. Ecol. Monogr. 91: c01427.
Kuhn C., Bogard M., Johnston S.E., John A., Vermote E., Spencer R., et al. 2020. Satellite and airborne remote sensing of gross primary productivity in boreal Alaskan lakes. Environ. Res. Lett. 15: 105001.
Kuhn C., de Matos Valerio A., Ward N., Loken L., Sawakuchi H.O., Kampel M., et al. 2019. Performance of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance products for river remote sensing retrievals of chlorophyll-a and turbidity. Remote Sens. Environ. 224: 104–118.
Makinster A.S., Persons W.R., Avery L.A., Bunch A.J. 2010. Colorado river fish monitoring in Grand Canyon, Arizona – 2000 to 2009 summary. Open-File Report, United States Geological Survey.
Mihalevich B.A., Neilson B.T., Buahin C.A., Yackulic C.B., Schmidt J.C. 2020. Water temperature controls for Regulated Canyon-Bound Rivers. Water Resour. Res. 56: e2020WR027566.
Miller M.P. 2012. The influence of reservoirs, climate, land use and hydrologic conditions on loads and chemical quality of dissolved organic carbon in the Colorado River. Water Resour. Res. 48.
Novales Flamarique I.N., Hawryshyn C.W. 1998. The common white sucker (Catostomus commersoni): a fish with ultraviolet sensitivity that lacks polarization sensitivity. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 182: 331–341.
Persons W.R., Ward D.L., Avery L.A. 2015. Standardized methods for Grand Canyon Fisheries Research 2015. Techniques and methods. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
Plummer M. 2003. JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling.
Poff N.L., Zimmerman J.K.H. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows: review of altered flow regimes. Freshw. Biol. 55: 194–205.
R Core Development Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Robinson A.T., Childs M.R. 2001. Juvenile growth of native fishes in the Little Colorado River and in a thermally modified portion of the Colorado River. North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21: 809–815.
Robinson C.T., Siebers A.R., Ortlepp J. 2018. Long-term ecological responses of the River Spöl to experimental floods. Freshw. Sci. 37: 433–447.
Rüegg J., Conn C.C., Anderson E.P., Battin T.J., Bernhardt E.S., Boix Canadell M., et al. 2021. Thinking like a consumer: linking aquatic basal metabolism and consumer dynamics. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 6: 1–17.
Sabo J.L., Caron M., Doucett R., Dibble K.L., Ruhi A., Marks J.C., et al. 2018. Pulsed flows, tributary inputs and food-web structure in a highly regulated river. J. Appl. Ecol. 55: 1884–1895.
Saunders W.C., Bouwes N., McHugh P., Jordan C.E. 2018. A network model for primary production highlights linkages between salmonid populations and autochthonous resources. Ecosphere, 9: e02131.
Schmidt J.C., Yackulic C.B., Kuhn E.2023.The Colorado River water crisis: its origin and the future. WIREs Water, e1672.
Schmidt J.C., Grams P.E. 2011. Effects of three high-flow experiments on the Colorado River ecosystem downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. Circular. US Department of the Interior 147.
Schmidt J.C., Webb R.H., Valdez R.A., Marzolf G.R., Stevens L.E. 1998. Science and values in river restoration in the Grand Canyon. BioScience, 48: 735–747.
Seegert S.E.Z., Rosi-Marshall E.J., Baxter C.V., Kennedy T.A., Hall R.O., Cross W.F. 2014. High diet overlap between native small-bodied fishes and nonnative fathead minnow in the Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 143: 1072–1083.
Tanner S.E., Vieira A.R., Vasconcelos R.P., Dores S., Azevedo M., Cabral H.N., Morrongiello J.R. 2019. Regional climate, primary productivity and fish biomass drive growth variation and population resilience in a small pelagic fish. Ecol. Indic. 103: 530–541.
Tierney L. 1994. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Ann. Stat. 22: 1701–1728.
Topping D.J., Rubin D.M., Vierra L.E., Jr. 2000. Colorado River sediment transport 1. Natural sediment supply limitation and the influence of Glen Canyon Dam. Water Resour. Res. 36: 515–545.
Voichick N., Kennedy T.A., Topping D.J., Griffiths R.E., Fry K. 2016. Water clarity of the Colorado River—implications for food webs and fish communities. Fact Sheet, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
Volkoff H., Rønnestad I. 2020. Effects of temperature on feeding and digestive processes in fish. Temperature, 7: 307–320.
Walters C.J., van Poorten B.T., Coggins L.G. 2012. Bioenergetics and population dynamics of flannelmouth sucker and bluehead sucker in Grand Canyon as evidenced by tag recapture observations. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 141: 158–173.
Ward J.V., Stanford J.A. 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. In Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Edited by Fontaine T. D., Bartell S. M. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI. pp. 29–42.
Weatherly A.H. 1990. Approaches to Understanding Fish Growth. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 119: 662–672.
Weiss S.J., Otis E.O., Maughan O.E. 1998. Spawning ecology of flannelmouth sucker, Catostomus lattipinnis (Catostomidae), in two small tributaries of the lower Colorado River. Environ. Biol. Fish. 52: 419–433.
White C.R., Alton L.A., Bywater C.L., Lombardi E.J., Marshall D.J. 2022. Metabolic scaling is the product of life-history optimization. Science, 377: 834–839.
Wurtsbaugh W.A., Heredia N.A., Laub B.G., Meredith C.S., Mohn H.E., Null S.E., et al. 2015. Approaches for studying fish production: do river and lake researchers have different perspectives? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 72: 149–160.
Yackulic C.B., Blake S., Bastille-Rousseau G. 2017. Benefits of the destinations, not costs of the journeys, shape partial migration patterns. J. Anim. Ecol. 86: 972–982.
Yackulic C.B., Korman J., Yard M.D., Dzul M. 2018. Inferring species interactions through joint mark–recapture analysis. Ecology, 99: 812–821.
Yackulic C.B., Yard M.D., Korman J., Van Haverbeke D.R. 2014. A quantitative life history of endangered humpback chub that spawn in the Little Colorado River: variation in movement, growth, and survival. Ecol. Evol. 4: 1006–1018.
Yard M.D., Bennett G.E., Mietz S.N., Coggins L.G., Stevens L.E., Hueftle S., Blinn D.W. 2005. Influence of topographic complexity on solar insolation estimates for the Colorado River, Grand Canyon, AZ. Ecol. Model. 183: 157–172.
Zarri L.J., Danner E.M., Daniels M.E., Palkovacs E.P. 2019. Managing hydropower dam releases for water users and imperiled fishes with contrasting thermal habitat requirements. J. Appl. Ecol. 56: 2423–2430.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1 (DOCX / 504 KB).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Volume 80Number 9September 2023
Pages: 1456 - 1469

History

Received: 29 September 2022
Accepted: 17 May 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 29 May 2023
Version of record online: 28 June 2023

Data Availability Statement

Data, and associated model code, generated during this study are available from the USGS ScienceBase-Catalog (https://doi.org/10.5066/P9852I1G; Hansen et al. 2023).

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. stream metabolism
  2. temperature
  3. turbidity
  4. primary consumer
  5. resource availability

Authors

Affiliations

U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, 524 Knoles Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing.
U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, and Writing – review & editing.
School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, 524 Knoles Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
Conservation Science Partners, Inc., 11050 Pioneer Trail, Suite 202, Truckee, CA 96161, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
Author Contributions: Data curation, Methodology, Validation, and Writing – review & editing.
School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, 524 Knoles Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, and Writing – review & editing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: LEH, CBY, BGD, RJB
Data curation: LEH, CBY, BRD
Formal analysis: LEH, CBY, BGD, RJB
Funding acquisition: CBY
Investigation: LEH, CBY, RJB
Methodology: LEH, CBY, BGD, BRD, RJB
Project administration: CBY, RJB
Resources: CBY, RJB
Software: CBY
Supervision: CBY, BGD, RJB
Validation: CBY, BRD
Visualization: LEH, CBY, RJB
Writing – original draft: LEH
Writing – review & editing: LEH, CBY, BGD, BRD, RJB

Competing Interests

Use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the US Government or Northern Arizona University. There is no conflict of interest declared in this research.

Funding Information

Data collection was funded by the Bureau of Reclamation through the Glen Canyon Adaptive Management Program.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Handling effects on dispersal of PIT-tagged Flannelmouth Sucker

View Options

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media