Cookies Notification

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.
×

Abstract

Characterizing seedling stands with respect to their species proportions and co-occurring vegetation is important for monitoring the desired development of the forest stand. Related inventory information has traditionally been collected with costly field surveys and National Forest Inventory (NFI)-based models. Here, we present a novel fusion approach to combine remote sensing (RS)-based models and NFI-based models to predict seedling stand characteristics, i.e., height, density, and tending needs. We used the best linear unbiased predictor for the fusion of the NFI- and RS-based models. The NFI-based models were derived using NFI sample plots and stand features. The RS-based models were derived using airborne laser scanning and color–infrared images and separate field-measured data. NFI-based models were found to be rather unreliable (RMSE = 65%–115% for stem density and 59%–78% for height), but they were always available without the need for any additional RS data. RS-based models provided an RMSE of 41%–92% for stem density and 26%–45% for height. The fusion procedure used at the prediction stage consistently increased the accuracy of all variables of interest, but the improvements were minor. In addition, we classified the tending need in seedling stands if the height of the coniferous tree was less than 1 m compared to broadleaved trees. If we simulate the decision-making situation of tending needs, we can predict tending needs (91% user accuracy) fairly well for a stand.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 19: 716–723.
Blomquist N.S. 1980. A note on the use of the coefficient of determination. Scand. J. Econ. 82: 409–412.
Breidenbach J., Magnussen S., Johannes R., Rasmus A. 2018. Unit-level and area-level small area estimation under heteroscedasticity using digital aerial photogrammetry data. Remote Sens. Environ. 212: 199–211.
ESRI. 2022. ArcGIS content team. World countries. Available from https://services.arcgis.com/P3ePLMYs2RVChkJx/arcgis/rest/services/World_Countries/FeatureServer [accessed September 2021].
Feduck C., McDermid G.J., Castilla G. 2018. Detection of coniferous seedlings in UAV Imagery. Forests, 9: 432.
GLCM. 2020. Package ‘GLCM’. Available from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glcm/glcm.pdf [accessed September 2021].
González R.C. 2008. Digital image processing. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, US. pp 830–836.
Gove J.H. 2009. Propagating probability distributions of stand variables using sequential Monte Carlo methods. Forestry, 82: 403–418.
Greene W.H. 2012. Econometric analysis. 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, US. pp 297–329.
Hall R.J., Aldred A.H. 1992. Forest regeneration appraisal with large-scale aerial photographs. For. Chron. 68(1): 142–150.
Haralick R.M., Shanmugam K., Dinsteein J. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3(6): 610–621.
Hirschmugl M., Ofner M., Raggam J., Schardt M. 2007. Single tree detection in very high resolution remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ. 110: 533–544.
Hou Z., Mehtätalo L., McRoberts R.E., Ståhl G., Tokola T., Rana P., et al. 2019. Remote sensing-assisted data assimilation and simultaneous inference for forest inventory. Remote Sens. Environ. 234: 111431.
Järvenpää J. 2016. Kuusen varhaiskehitys 3–15—vuotiailla kääntömätästyskohteilla—maasto-ja paikkatietoaineistoihin perustuva pituuskehityksen mallinnus. [Early development of Norway spruce at 3–15 year old inverted sites—modelling height development using GIS-based data]. Master's thesis, Faculty of Agriculture and forestry, Department of forest science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 60p.
Kangas A. 1991. Updated measurement data as prior information in forest inventory. Silva Fenn. 25: 181–191.
Korhonen L., Pippuri I., Packalén P., Heikkinen V., Maltamo M., Heikkilä J. 2013. Detection of the need for seedling stand tending using high-resolution remote sensing data. Silva Fenn. 47(2): 952.
Korpela I., Tuomola T., Tokola T., Dahlin B. 2008. Appraisal of seedling-stand vegetation with airborne imagery and discrete-return LiDAR—an exploratory analysis. Silva Fenn. 42(5): 753–772.
Korpela I., Mehtätalo L., Markelin L., Seppänen A., Kangas A. 2014. Tree species identification in aerial image data using directional reflectance signatures. Silva Fenn. 48(3): 1087.
Lahoz W.A., Schneider P. 2014. Data assimilation: making sense of earth observation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2(16): 1–28.
Lehtosalo M., Mäkelä A., Valkonen S. 2010. Regeneration and tree dynamics of Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in regeneration areas treated with spot mounding in southern Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 25: 213–223.
Luoranen J., Saksa T., Finer L., Tamminen P. 2007. Metsämaanmuokkausopas. [Guide for silvicultural soil preparation]. Suonenjoen toimintayksikkö, Metsäntutkimuslaitos. 75p. [In Finnish].
Mehtätalo L., Lappi J. 2020. Biometry for forestry and environmental data: with examples in R. 1st ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York. 426p.
Miina J., Saksa T. 2008. Predicting establishment of tree seedlings for evaluating methods of regeneration for Pinus sylvestris. Scand. J. For. Res. 23(1): 12–27.
Miina J., Saksa T. 2013. Predicting establishment of tree seedlings in regeneration areas of Picea abies. Balt. For. 19(2): 187–200.
Miina J., Turunen J., Korhonen K.T., Sandström M, Ahola A. 2018. Predicting the need for tending of conifer seedling stands in southern Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 33(7): 641–649.
Næsset E., Bjerknes K.O. 2001. Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens. Environ. 78: 328–340.
Nyström M., Lindgren N., Wallerman J., Grafström A., Muszta A., Nyström K., et al. 2015. Data assimilation in forest inventory: first empirical results. Forests, 6(12): 4540–4557.
Pouliot D.A., King D.J., Pitt D.G. 2005. Development and evaluation of an automated tree detection—delineation algorithm for monitoring regenerating coniferous forests. Can. J. For. Res. 35(10): 2332–2345.
Puliti S., Solberg S., Granhus A. 2019. Use of UAV photogrammetric data for estimation of biophysical properties in forest stands under regeneration. Remote Sens. 11: 233.
Siipilehto J. 2006. Linear prediction application for modelling the relationships between a large number of stand characteristics of Norway spruce stands. Silva Fenn. 40(3): 517–530.
Siipilehto J. 2011. Local prediction of stand structure using linear prediction theory in Scots pine-dominated stands in Finland. Silva Fenn. 45(4): 669–692.
Siipilehto J. 2021. Taimikoiden tila valtakunnan metsien 11. Inventoinnin mukaan ja biometriset mallit eritasoisilla lähtötiedoilla. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja.
Siipilehto J., Valkonen S., Päätalo M.-L. 2015. Männyn-ja kuusentaimikoiden kehitys erilaisia metsänuudistamisketjuja käytettäessä. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja, 1/2015: 5–21.
Tenenbaum D.E., Band L.E., Kenworthy S.T., Tague C.L. 2006. Analysis of soil moisture patterns in forested and suburban catchments in Baltimore, Maryland, using high-resolution photogrammetric and LIDAR digital elevation datasets. Hydrol. Processes, 20: 219–240.
Tuominen S., Pekkarinen A. 2004. Local radiometric correction of digital aerial photographs for multisource forest inventory. Remote Sens. Environ. 89: 72–78.
Uotila K., Rantala J., Saksa T. 2012. Estimating the need for early cleaning in Norway spruce plantations in Finland. Silva Fenn. 46(5): 683–693.
Wallace L., Lucieer A., Watson C.S. 2014. Evaluating tree detection and segmentation routines on very high resolution UAV LiDAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(12): 7619–7627.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Volume 53Number 4April 2023
Pages: 302 - 313

History

Received: 16 May 2022
Accepted: 2 December 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 12 January 2023
Version of record online: 15 February 2023

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. biometric modeling
  2. seedling stands
  3. monitoring regeneration
  4. ALS
  5. GIS data

Authors

Affiliations

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Finland
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. BOX 111, Joensuu FI-80101, Finland
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing.
Ulla Mattila
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. BOX 111, Joensuu FI-80101, Finland
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing.
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Finland
Author Contributions: Formal analysis, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
Jouni Siipilehto
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Finland
Author Contributions: Formal analysis, Methodology, and Writing – review & editing.
College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Author Contributions: Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, and Writing – review & editing.
Key Laboratory of Bamboo and Rattan, International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan, Beijing 100102, China
Author Contributions: Methodology and Writing – review & editing.
Timo Tokola
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. BOX 111, Joensuu FI-80101, Finland
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: PR, UM, TT
Data curation: TT
Formal analysis: PR, UM, LM, JS, ZH
Funding acquisition: TT
Methodology: PR, UM, JS, ZH, QX, TT
Project administration: TT
Software: UM, ZH
Supervision: LM, TT
Validation: PR, UM
Writing – original draft: PR, UM
Writing – review & editing: PR, UM, LM, JS, ZH, QX, TT

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Multispectral Light Detection and Ranging Technology and Applications: A Review

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media