Impacts of fire and climate change on long-term nitrogen availability and forest productivity in the New Jersey Pine Barrens

Publication: Canadian Journal of Forest Research
3 January 2014

Abstract

Increased wildfires and temperatures due to climate change are expected to have profound effects on forest productivity and nitrogen (N) cycling. Forecasts about how wildfire and climate change will affect forests seldom consider N availability, which may limit forest response to climate change, particularly in fire-prone landscapes. The overall objective of this study was to examine how wildfire and climate change affect long-term mineral N availability in a fire-prone landscape. We employed a commonly used landscape simulation model (LANDIS-II) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, a landscape characterized by frequent small fires and fire-resilient vegetation. We found that fire had little effect on mineral N, whereas climate change and fire together reduced mineral N by the end of the century. Though N initially limited forest productivity, mineral N was no longer limiting after 50 years. Our results suggest that mineral N is resilient to fire under our current climate but not under climate change. Also, predictions that do not consider N limitation may underestimate short-term but not long-term productivity responses to climate change. Together these results illustrate the importance of including N dynamics when simulating the effects of climate change on forest productivity, particularly in fire-prone regions such as the New Jersey Pine Barrens.

Résumé

On s’attend à ce que l’augmentation des températures et des feux de forêt due aux changements climatiques aient de sérieux impacts sur la productivité des forêts et le recyclage de l’azote (N). Les prévisions concernant les impacts des feux et des changements climatiques sur les forêts tiennent rarement compte de la disponibilité de N, laquelle peut limiter la réaction de la forêt aux changements climatiques, particulièrement dans les paysages sujets aux feux. L’objectif général de cette étude consistait à examiner comment les feux de forêt et les changements climatiques affectent la disponibilité à long terme de N minéral dans un paysage sujet aux feux. Nous avons utilisé un modèle de simulation du paysage d’usage courant (LANDIS-II) dans les pinèdes de la plaine côtière du New Jersey, un paysage caractérisé par de fréquents feux de faible intensité et une végétation qui supporte bien les feux. Nous avons trouvé que le feu avait peu d’effet sur N minéral tandis que les changements climatiques couplés aux feux réduisaient la disponibilité de N vers la fin du siècle. Même si initialement N limitait la productivité de la forêt, N minéral n’était plus un facteur limitant après 50 ans. Nos résultats indiquent que N minéral n’est pas affecté par les feux dans les conditions climatiques actuelles mais qu’il le sera dans les conditions associées aux changements climatiques. De plus, les prédictions qui ne tiennent pas compte de la disponibilité de N pourraient sous-estimer les réactions de la productivité aux changements climatiques à court mais non à long terme. Globalement, ces résultats illustrent l’importance d’inclure la dynamique de N lorsqu’on simule les effets des changements climatiques sur la productivité des forêts, particulièrement dans les régions sujettes aux feux comme c’est le cas dans les pinèdes de la plaine côtière du New Jersey. [Traduit par la Rédaction]

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Burns, R.M., and Honkala, B.H. 1990. Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., Agriculture Handbook No. 654.
Campbell J., Hornbeck J., McDowell W., Buso D., Shanley J., and Likens G. 2000. Dissolved organic nitrogen budgets for upland, forested ecosystems in New England. Biogeochemistry, 49(2): 123–142.
Campbell J.L., Rustad L.E., Boyer E.W., Christopher S.F., Driscoll C.T., Fernandez I.J., Groffman P.M., Houle D., Kiekbusch J., Magill A.H., Mitchell M.J., and Ollinger S.V. 2009. Consequences of climate change for biogeochemical cycling in forests of northeastern North America. Can. J. For. Res. 39(2): 264–284.
Carreira J.A., Niell F.X., and Lajtha K. 1994. Soil nitrogen availability and nitrification in Mediterranean shrublands of varying fire history and successional stage. Biogeochemistry, 26(3): 189–209.
Chapin F.S. III, Van Cleve K., and Tryon P.R. 1986. Relationship of ion absorption to growth rate in taiga trees. Oecologia, 69: 238–242.
Clark K., Skowronski N., Hom J., Duveneck M., Pan Y., Van Tuyl S., Cole J., Patterson M., and Maurer S. 2009. Decision support tools to improve the effectiveness of hazardous fuel reduction treatments. Int. J. Wildland Fire, 18: 268–277.
Clark K.L., Skowronski N., and Hom J. 2010. Invasive insects impact forest carbon dynamics. Glob. Change Biol. 16: 88–101.
Covington W.W., DeBano L.F., and Huntsberger T.G. 1991. Soil nitrogen changes associated with slash pile burning in pinyon–juniper woodlands. For. Sci. 37(1): 347–395.
de Vries W. and Posch M. 2011. Modelling the impact of nitrogen deposition, climate change and nutrient limitations on tree carbon sequestration in Europe for the period 1900–2050. Environ. Pollut. 159(10): 2289–2299.
Debano L.F. and Conrad C.E. 1978. The effect of fire on nutrients in a chaparral ecosystem. Ecology, 59(3): 489–497.
DeBell D.S. and Ralston C.W. 1970. Release of nitrogen by burning light forest fuels. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 34: 936–938.
DeLuca T.H. and Sala A. 2006. Frequent fire alters nitrogen transformations in ponderosa pine stands of the inland northwest. Ecology, 87: 2511–2522.
Durán J., Rodríguez A., Fernández-Palacios J., and Gallardo A. 2009. Changes in net N mineralization rates and soil N and P pools in a pine forest wildfire chronosequence. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 45(7): 781–788.
Forman R.T.T. and Boerner R.E. 1981. Fire frequency and the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 108: 34–50.
Gao Y., Kennish M.J., and Flynn A.M. 2007. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the New Jersey coastal waters and its implications. Ecol. Appl. 17(5): S31–S41.
Hafner S.D. and Groffman P.M. 2005. Soil nitrogen cycling under litter and coarse woody debris in a mixed forest in New York State. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37(11): 2159–2162.
Hungate B.A., Dukes J.S., Shaw M.R., Luo Y., and Field C.B. 2003. Nitrogen and climate change. Science, 302(5650): 1512–1513.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Iverson L.R. and Prasad A.M. 1998. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecol. Monogr. 68(4): 465–485.
Iverson L.R. and Prasad A.M. 2002. Potential redistribution of tree species habitat under five climate change scenarios in the eastern US. For. Ecol. Manage. 155(1–3): 205–222.
Kelly R.H., Parton W.J., Crocker G.J., Graced P.R., Klír J., Körschens M., Poulton P.R., and Richter D.D. 1997. Simulating trends in soil organic carbon in long-term experiments using the century model. Geoderma, 81(1–2): 75–90.
Lathrop, R., and Kaplan, M. 2004. New Jersey land use/land cover update: 2000–2001. Available at http://www.nj.gov/dep/dsr/landuse/landuse00-01.pdf.
Luo Y., Su B., Currie W.S., Dukes J.S., Finzi A., Hartwig U., Hungate B.A., McMurtrie R.E., Oren R., Parton W.J., Pataki D.E., Shaw M.R., Zak D., and Field C.B. 2004. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. BioScience, 54(8): 731–739.
Melillo J.M., Butler S., Johnson J., Mohan J., Steudler P., Lux H., Burrows E., Bowles F., Smith R., Scott L., Vario C., Hill T., Burton A., Zhou Y.-M., and Tang J. 2011. Soil warming, carbon–nitrogen interactions, and forest carbon budgets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108(23): 9508–9512.
Mladenoff D.J. 2004. LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecol. Model. 180(1): 7–19.
Norby R.J., DeLucia E.H., Gielen B., Calfapietra C., Giardina C.P., King J.S., Ledford J., McCarthy H.R., Moore D.J.P., Ceulemans R., De Angelis P., Finzi A.C., Karnosky D.F., Kubiske M.E., Lukac M., Pregitzer K.S., Scarascia-Mugnozza G.E., Schlesinger W.H., and Oren R. 2005. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(50): 18052–18056.
Norby R.J., Warren J.M., Iversen C.M., Medlyn B.E., and McMurtrie R.E. 2010. CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107(45): 19368–19373.
Oechel W.C., Cowles S., Grulke N., Hastings S.J., Lawrence B., Prudhomme T., Riechers G., Strain B., Tissue D., and Vourlitis G. 1994. Transient nature of CO2 fertilization in Arctic tundra. Nature, 371(6497): 500–503.
Pan Y., Birdsey R., Hom J., McCullough K., and Clark K. 2006. Improved estimates of net primary productivity from MODIS satellite data at regional and local scales. Ecol. Appl. 16(1): 125–132.
Pan Y., Birdsey R., Hom J., and McCullough K. 2009. Separating effects of changes in atmospheric composition, climate and land-use on carbon sequestration of U.S. Mid-Atlantic temperate forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 259(2): 151–164.
Parton, W.J., Anderson, D.W., Cole, C.V., and Steward, J.W.B. 1983. Simulation of soil organic matter formation and mineralization in semiarid agroecosystems. In Nutrient cycling in agricultural ecosystems. Edited by R.R. Lowrance, R.L. Todd, L.E. Asmussen, and R.A. Leonard. The University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Athens, Georgia, U.S.A.
Pastor J. and Post W.M. 1988. Response of northern forests to CO2-induced climate change. Nature, 334(6177): 55–58.
Poovarodom S., Tate R.L.I., and Bloom R.A. 1988. Nitrogen mineralization rates of the acidic, xeric soils of the New Jersey Pinelands: field rates. Soil Sci. 145(4): 257–263.
Raison R. 1979. Modification of the soil environment by vegetation fires, with particular reference to nitrogen transformations: a review. Plant Soil, 51: 73–108.
Rundel, P.W. 1983. Impact of fire on nutrient cycles in Mediterranean-type ecosystems with reference to chaparral. In Mediterranean-type ecosystems: the role of nutrients. Edited by F.J. Kruger, D.T. Mitchell, and J.U.M. Jarvis. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 192–207.
Ruosteenoja, K., Carter, T.R., Jylha, K., and Tuomenvirta, H. 2003. Future climate in world regions: an intercomparison of model-based projections for the new IPCC emissions scenarios, Finland. The Finnish Environment 644.
Rustad L.E., Campbell J.L., Marion G.M., Norby R.J., Mitchell M.J., Hartley A.E., Cornelissen J.H.C., and Gurevitch J. 2001. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia, 126: 543–562.
Scheller R.M., Domingo J.B., Sturtevant B.R., Williams J.S., Rudy A., Gustafson E.J., and Mladenoff D.J. 2007. Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible spatial and temporal resolution. Ecol. Model. 201(3–4): 409–419.
Scheller R.M., Van Tuyl S., Clark K., Hayden N.G., Hom J., and Mladenoff D.J. 2008. Simulation of forest change in the New Jersey Pine Barrens under current and pre-colonial conditions. For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 1489–1500.
Scheller R.M., Hua D., Bolstad P.V., Birdsey R.A., and Mladenoff D.J. 2011a. The effects of forest harvest intensity in combination with wind disturbance on carbon dynamics in Lake States mesic forests. Ecol. Model. 222: 144–153.
Scheller R.M., Van Tuyl S., Clark K.L., Hom J., and La Puma I. 2011b. Carbon sequestration in the New Jersey Pine Barrens under different scenarios of fire management. Ecosystems, 14: 987–1004.
Scheller R.M., Kretchun A.M., Van Tuyl S., Clark K.L., Lucash M.S., and Hom J. 2012. Divergent carbon dynamics under climate change in forests with diverse soils, tree species, and land use histories. Ecosphere, 3(11): art110.
Scholze M., Knorr W., Arnell N.W., and Prentice I.C. 2006. A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(35): 13116–13120.
Scott, J.H., and Burgan, R.E. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153.
Seitzinger S., Harrison J.A., Bohlke J.K., Bouwman A.F., Lowrance R., Peterson B., Tobias C., and Van Drecht G. 2006. Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 166(6): 2064–2090.
Semenov M.A. and Barrow E.M. 1997. Use of a stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios. Clim. Change, 35: 397–414.
Stacey, P.E., Greening, H.S., Kremer, N., Peterson, D.L., and Tomasko, D.A. 2000. Contribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to U.S. estuaries: summary and conclusion. In Nitrogen loading in coastal water bodies: an atmospheric perspective. Edited by R.A. Valigura, R.B. Alensander, M.S. Castro, T.P. Meyers, H.W. Paerl, P.E. Stacey, and R.E. Turner. The American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.
Stephan K., Kavanagh K.L., and Koyama A. 2012. Effects of spring prescribed burning and wildfires on watershed nitrogen dynamics of central Idaho headwater areas. For. Ecol. Manage. 263: 240–252.
Stephens S.L. and Ruth L.W. 2005. Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 15(2): 532–542.
Stephens S.L., Martin R.E., and Clinton N.E. 2007. Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California’s forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands. For. Ecol. Manage. 251(3): 205–216.
Sturtevant B.R., Scheller R.M., Miranda B.R., and Shinneman D. 2009. Simulating dynamic and mixed-severity fire regimes: a process-based fire extension for LANDIS-II. Ecol. Model. 220: 3380–3393.
Syphard A.D., Franklin J., and Keeley J.E. 2011. Simulating the effects of frequent fire on southern California coastal shrublands. Ecol. Appl. 16(5): 1744–1756.
Tedrow, J.C.F. 1986. Soils of New Jersey. Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, Florida, U.S.A., Publication A-15134-1-82.
U.S. Department of Agriculture National Cartography and GIS Center. 1994. State soil geographic (STATSGO) database. Data use information. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Cartography and GIS Center, Fort Worth, Texas, Report No. 1492.
Vadeboncoeur, M.A., Ouimette, A.P., and Hobbie, E.A. 2012. A robust method confirming organic nitrogen uptake by mycorrhizal roots in a temperate forest. In 97th Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 5–10 August 2012.
Van Wagner, C.E. 1987. Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Forestry Technical Report 35.
Wang, F., Mladenoff, D.J., Forrester, J.A., Blanco, J.A., Scheller, R.M., Peckham, S.D., Keough, C., and Lucash, M. 2014. Multi-model simulations of forest harvesting effects on long-term productivity and CN cycling in aspen forests. Ecol. Appl. In press.
Westerling A.L., Hidalgo H.G., Cayan D.R., and Swetnam T.W. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science, 313(5789): 940–943.
White E.M., Thompson W.W., and Gartner F.R. 1973. Heat effects on nutrient release from soils under ponderosa pine. J. Range Manage. 26(1): 22–24.
Zhang L., Jacob D.J., Knipping E.M., Kumar N., Munger J.W., Carouge C.C., van Donkelaar A., Wang Y.X., and Chen D. 2012. Nitrogen deposition to the United States: distribution, sources, and processes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12: 4539–4554.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data (cjfr-2013-0383suppl.pdf)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Volume 44Number 5May 2014
Pages: 404 - 412

History

Received: 17 September 2013
Accepted: 21 December 2013
Published online: 3 January 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. Century
  2. forest simulation model
  3. LANDIS-II
  4. nitrogen cycle

Mots-clés

  1. Century
  2. modèle de simulation de la forêt
  3. LANDIS-II
  4. cycle de l’azote

Authors

Affiliations

Melissa S. Lucash
Department of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Robert M. Scheller
Department of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Alec M. Kretchun
Department of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Kenneth L. Clark
USDA Forest Service, Silas Little Experimental Forest, 501 Four Mile Road, New Lisbon, NJ 08064, USA.
John Hom
USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 11 Campus Blvd., Suite 200, Newtown Square, PA 19073, USA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

1. Managing for red‐cockaded woodpeckers is more complicated under climate change
2. Development of a Climate-Sensitive Matrix Growth Model for Larix gmelinii Mixed-Species Natural Forests and Its Application for Predicting Forest Dynamics under Different Climate Scenarios
3. Landscape-Scale Forest Reorganization Following Insect Invasion and Harvest Under Future Climate Change Scenarios
4. Complex interactions among successional trajectories and climate govern spatial resilience after severe windstorms in central Wisconsin, USA
5.
6. Modeling Post-Fire Tree Mortality Using a Logistic Regression Method within a Forest Landscape Model
7. More than the sum of its parts: how disturbance interactions shape forest dynamics under climate change
8. Interactions Among Fuel Management, Species Composition, Bark Beetles, and Climate Change and the Potential Effects on Forests of the Lake Tahoe Basin
9. A coupled modeling framework for predicting ecosystem carbon dynamics in boreal forests
10. Spatial resilience of forested landscapes under climate change and management

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Subscribe

Click on the button below to subscribe to Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Purchase options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media