Introduction
One of the world’s most invasive and widely distributed aquatic animals is the Asian clam (
Corbicula fluminea (O.F. Müller, 1774)). Indigenous to southeast Asia, Australia, and Africa,
C. fluminea has expanded its range within three other continents (North America, South America, and Europe) over the past several decades, aided by ballast water transport, food markets, bait bucket dumping from anglers, and aquarium release (
Sousa et al. 2008;
Crespo et al. 2015). Given its apparent affinity for high temperatures (with a long-term upper thermal tolerance of 36 °C in the field;
McMahon 1999) and its predominantly subtropical distribution (
Crespo et al. 2015;
Penk and Williams 2019),
C. fluminea was assumed to be unable to invade unheated lakes and rivers in north temperate regions — an assumption promoted by a widely cited laboratory study that tested the response of clams from a single population and concluded that the lower lethal temperature of the species is 2 °C (
Mattice and Dye 1975). Several field studies appear to support this conclusion (
Horning and Keup 1964;
French and Schloesser 1991,
1996;
Morgan et al. 2003;
Werner and Rothhaupt 2008). In the Connecticut River (USA), for example, survivorship of
C. fluminea was positively correlated with the mean winter water temperature and negatively correlated with the frequency of daily mean water temperatures of ≤1 °C (
Morgan et al. 2003). An Ohio River (USA) population whose abundance varied from 215 to 2390 clams/m
2 was reduced by >96% after an anomalously severe winter season caused the river to freeze over for several days (
Horning and Keup 1964). In outdoor mesocosms under natural winter conditions, 99.9% of a
C. fluminea population died after being exposed to temperatures below 2 °C for 2 months (
Werner and Rothhaupt 2008).
Consistent with the view that cold winter temperatures constrain the distribution of
C. fluminea, almost all populations found in northeastern USA and in the Great Lakes region are restricted to the heated water discharge plumes of power plants (e.g.,
French and Schloesser 1991,
1996;
Ward and Hodgson 1997;
Smith et al. 2018). A population of
C. fluminea became established in the St. Lawrence River circa 2009, the most northernmost occurrence of the species in North America to date, but it remained confined within the thermal plume generated by the Gentilly-2 nuclear power plant in Bécancour, Quebec (
Simard et al. 2012). In this environment, water temperatures close to the discharge source were 10–13 °C higher than ambient. Although this temperature difference attenuated downstream and varied throughout the year, it prevented winter freezing in a ∼4 km downstream section of the river (
Castañeda et al. 2018). Within a few years of its discovery, the St. Lawrence River population consisted of hundreds to thousands of clams per square kilometre inside the thermal plume. The population was abruptly extirpated over the winter months of 2012–2013, after the power plant was shut down permanently in December 2012 (
Castañeda et al. 2018).
However, since at least the 1990s, populations of
C. fluminea have been observed in areas subject to snow and ice cover, prompting speculation of evolving cold tolerance (
Kreiser and Milton 1995;
Janech and Hunter 1995;
Minchin 2014;
Natale et al. 2014;
Richardson and Selby 2020). In a bay in Lough Derg, Ireland, individuals of
C. fluminea survived 0.9 °C for almost 2 weeks below ice (
Minchin 2014).
Janech and Hunter (1995) noted the presence of a persistent population in the upper Clinton River, Michigan, USA, that was exposed to water temperatures of 0–2 °C for over 2 months. Similarly,
Müller and Baur (2011) reported that 18% of Asian clams from a population in the River Altrhein, Germany, could tolerate water temperatures near 0 °C for 9 weeks in the laboratory. Overwintering populations of
C. fluminea continue to be discovered in unheated waterbodies in northeastern North America. One such population was found in Lake George, New York, USA, in 2010, where it has persisted for over a decade, in spite of freezing winter temperatures and repeated eradication attempts by lake managers (
Lake George Park Commission 2018; M. Modley, Lake Champlain Basin Program, personal communication). Overwintering populations have also been found in the Seneca River and Owasco Lake in New York State (
Natale et al. 2014; E. Cvetanovska, personal observation). Each of these waterbodies occurs in a region where mean winter air temperatures are below freezing from December to February inclusive (
https://www.weather-us.com). These discoveries suggest that previous assessments of the thermal tolerance of
C. fluminea and its potential to expand its northern range are inaccurate, or at least very incomplete.
Here, we compared low-temperature survivorship of six eastern North American populations of Asian clams, all identifiable as the same clonal morphotype, Form A (
Lee et al. 2005). Although exposure to extreme environmental conditions can produce compromising non-lethal effects on feeding, growth, and reproduction (e.g.,
Morey et al. 2019), survivorship of such conditions can indicate the capacity for a species to establish in suboptimal habitats (
McDowell et al. 2014). Recognizing that the persistence of a population requires its individuals to resume normal activities following a major stress, we also assessed the ability of clams to resume normal feeding at non-stressful temperatures after prolonged cold temperature exposure.
We hypothesized that survivorship would vary with population (site), acclimation temperature, and body size. Thus, we tested the following predictions:
(P1) Owing to their acclimation history in the field, individuals from the overwintering population in Lake George would have a higher survivorship under cold conditions than would individuals collected from the artificial thermal plume in the St. Lawrence River prior to the shutdown of the Gentilly-2 nuclear power plant.
(P2) Individuals from St. Lawrence River sites located farther away from the thermal discharge source, where water temperatures are relatively cooler in winter, would exhibit higher survivorship under cold conditions than those located closer to the discharge source.
(P3) Northern populations in general would exhibit a higher survivorship under cold conditions than would southern populations (cf.
Addo-Bediako et al. 2000).
Materials and methods
Specimens were collected using either a Petite Ponar grab at depths 2.0–3.5 m (from St. Lawrence River, Seneca River, and Owasco Lake) or a hand-held sieve at depths of 0.3–1.0 m (from all other sites). All clams were active and appeared healthy at the time of collection. Samples were placed in plastic containers filled with water from the site and transported to our laboratory in coolers within 3 to 24 h of collection. Clams from the three southern sites were shipped by overnight courier in sealed plastic containers with water and sediment. During transport in all cases, mortality was minimal (<2%).
Upon arrival in the laboratory, clams were placed in 50 L aquaria supplied with ∼3 cm of pre-washed gravel and a charcoal filter in water maintained at 17–18 °C in a room with a 12 h dark : 12 h light cycle — except when under cold exposure, in which the clams were held in complete darkness in the temperature chamber. They were subjected to 20% water exchanges (using conditioned tap water) and fed with ground spirulina flakes (Nutrafin Max Spirulina Flakes; 5 mg/100 clams) every 2 days. During acclimation and exposure treatments, water temperature in each aquarium was monitored with an electronic logger and checked daily.
Experiment 1: St. Lawrence River versus Lake George populations
For this first experiment, Asian clams from the St. Lawrence River were collected from the thermal plume originating at the outflow of the Gentilly-2 nuclear power plant in Bécancour, Quebec (46°23′42.5″N, 72°21′23.5″W). Four sites along a 1 km section of the plume (
Fig. 1) were sampled repeatedly during other monitoring studies (
Hamelin et al. 2016;
Castañeda et al. 2018). Throughout the year, a 6 °C difference in mean water temperature existed between the two most widely spaced sites (
Castañeda et al. 2018). In September 2012, we collected live clams at each site from 1.9 to 2.8 m depths using a Petite Ponar grab. In the laboratory, the clams were kept in 50 L aquaria separated according to their site of origin and maintained at 18 °C. Three times per week they were subjected with 20% water exchanges and fed with ground spirulina flakes. Clams were collected from Lake George (43°37′20″N, 73°32′48″W) (
Fig. 2) in October 2012, shipped to the laboratory within 24 h, and were maintained in two additional tanks at 18 °C using the same protocol.
In January 2013, we began an 8-week experiment using 20 clams from each of the four St. Lawrence River sites and 20 clams from Lake George. Groups of 10 clams were separated by site into 10 different 16 L aquaria and acclimated by ramping down at 1 °C/h to a final temperature of 1 °C. The aquaria with the clams then were kept in a temperature-controlled chamber at 1 °C for 8 weeks. Clams were not fed during this period. To minimize disturbance to individuals, mortality was checked every 3 days and 20% of the water was replaced with conditioned water weekly. Mortality was checked by gently forcing the tip of a dissection needle between posterior valve margins in the region of the siphons (
McMahon et al. 1995;
Müller and Baur 2011); living clams resisted needle entry by firmly closing their valves, whereas dead clams failed to react after needle insertion. This test causes no apparent damage to live clams (
McMahon et al. 1995; E. Cvetanovska, personal observation). After 8 weeks, temperatures were ramped up at the rate of 1 °C/h to 18 °C, and recovery (i.e., ability of mussels to survive exposure and return to normal feeding) was tracked for an additional 8 weeks using the same procedure as above. Every 2 days during recovery, water was replaced and clams were fed with spirulina flakes (5 mg/100 clams).
Experiment 2: northern versus southern populations
The results of the first experiment prompted a larger interpopulation comparison in which experimental animals were collected from six unheated waterbodies during autumn 2013 (late August to early-November). The three northern populations were located in New York State: Lake George (43°37′20″N, 73°32′48″W), Seneca River (42°56′08″N, 76°46′01″W), and Owasco Lake (42°53′35″N, 76°31′51″W).
The three southern populations were located at Sinking Creek, Virginia, USA (37°18′11″N, 80°29′09″W); Upper Clinch River, Virginia, USA (37°05′38.5″N, 81°47′08″W); and Lake Cheston, Tennessee, USA (35°12′36″N, 85°55′49″W) (
Fig. 2). These populations were from sites that differed in exposure to low temperatures. Lake Cheston is a very small reservoir (area 0.03 km
2, depth 7 m) formed by the impoundment of a small stream; its winter surface water temperatures typically exceed 9 °C (D.B. Conn, unpublished data). Owing to their higher elevation and greater depths, the other two sites periodically experienced minimum water temperatures that approached our experimental treatment; surface water temperatures typically range from 0.5 to 29.5 °C for Sinking Creek and from 1.5 to 25 °C for Upper Clinch River (D. Hua, Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency, personal communication). However, among the southern sites, Upper Clinch River had experienced the greatest number of days in which the mean daily temperature was below 0 °C and was the only site whose mean minimum winter temperature was below 0 °C (
Table 1).
The 10 °C acclimation trial
Two replicate groups of ten clams from each of the six sites were kept separately in twelve 2.5 L aquaria. The ambient water temperature (17–18 °C) was ramped down to 10 °C at a rate of 2 °C/day. The aquaria were then maintained in a temperature-controlled chamber at 10 °C for a 30-day acclimation period; during this time, clams were fed with ground spirulina flakes. Following acclimation, the ambient water temperature was ramped down to 1 °C at a rate of 2 °C/day and the aquaria were subsequently maintained in a temperature-controlled chamber at 1 °C for the 8-week experimental period; during this time, clams were not fed and they were checked twice per week for mortality, using the same procedure as in experiment 1. As a control for the experiments, clams from all populations were maintained in a temperature-controlled room at 18 °C, following the same feeding and water changing regime as for the recovery period. These aquaria were maintained for >6 months; mortality was negligible (<2%) during this time. At the end of the 8-week exposure period, temperatures were raised at the rate of 1 °C/h to 18 °C, after which tanks were moved to a temperature-controlled wet laboratory and maintained at 16–18 °C for an 8-week recovery period. Water was changed every 2 days during the acclimation, exposure, and recovery periods; clams were fed every 2 days during the acclimation and recovery periods. Mortality was checked daily and dead clams were removed immediately.
The 18 °C acclimation trial
In this experimental trial, four of the six populations were used, because clams from Seneca River and Lake Cheston populations were depleted from the previous experimental trial more rapidly than anticipated and there were insufficient numbers for this second trial. Two groups of 10 clams from each of the remaining four sites were separated into eight 2.5 L aquaria. The aquaria were kept in a temperature-controlled room at 18 °C for a 30-day acclimation. Immediately following acclimation, clams were moved to an experimental chamber and the water temperature was ramped down to 1 °C at a rate of 2 °C/day. The aquaria were maintained at 1 °C for 8 weeks, as in the previous experiment. At the end of the exposure period, water temperatures were raised to 12 °C at 2 °C/day and all tanks were moved to the temperature-controlled laboratory maintained at 16–18 °C for an 8-week recovery period, following the protocol for the previous experiment. In all trials for this and the previous experiment, water temperatures were monitored using electronic temperature loggers.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 3.6.1 2019; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available from
https://www.r-project.org). For data from experiment 1, the assumption of normality was not met; therefore, a
χ2 test was used to examine differences in survival among all five sites and the post hoc
χ2 test package was used to identify population differences. For experiment 2, survivorship results were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a binomial error distribution and logit link, which is appropriate for non-normal data containing random effects and a binary response variable (
Bolker et al. 2009). The binary response variable was clam survivorship (alive or dead) after the recovery period, with fixed factors of site and clam size (maximum length, millimetre) and a random effect of tank nested within population. Owing to the difference in the number of populations tested at each acclimation temperature, and because these two treatments were conducted separately, separate GLMMs were run for the 10 °C and 18 °C acclimations. Interpopulation differences were compared using a multiple comparisons Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. The GLMM-predicted probabilities of survivorship were plotted against body size (length).
For experiment 2, daily variation in survivorship following the 10 °C acclimation experiment was explored further using the Kaplan–Meier method to generate survivorship curves. The relationship between location and survivorship was tested using a Cox model (
Cox and Oakes 1984), and survivorship curves were compared among populations using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. To determine exactly which populations differed in survival, a multiple comparisons Tukey’s HSD post hoc test was used.